Where there is smoke, there is usually fire. I imagine that there is something to this. How much, we don't know. But with Disney's track record here lately, I would guess something will come of this.
Right. It might be for some, but terrible for others. But it will always be in Disney's best interest regardless.I think most believe that there is a good chance we will see afternoon and evening reservations for AP holders.
It’s whether or not one believes this is going to be a good thing and enhance options.
Haven't read the full thread yet, and probably someone beat me to it, but initially FP+ WAS limited to just 3 per day.I’m waiting for more information from more official sources. I can’t help remembering when the earliest reports of FP+ came out - the word was “You can only get 3 a day!!” And of course that turned out to be incomplete - you could only book 3 a day in advance but weren’t limited to a maximum of 3 each day. So I’m not getting all riled up yet, even though we too often stay offsite.
The person who started that thread....claims to be an insider, and maybe is, but I also tend to take his posts with a grain of salt, because he says some things that are a little questionable if you read many of his posts. I get the impression he works at WDW, but maybe not that high up...so some of what he says is more his opinion/impression based on limited information than hard-core fact.I agree as well, however the Disney Insider on the other forum thinks, that disney thinks, that this solves the lawsuit issue. (Sorry if that sentence was hard to read!)
That’s not what I remember. I remember being able to book 3 FP+ prior to our trips and then being able to book more, one at a time, after using those 3.Haven't read the full thread yet, and probably someone beat me to it, but initially FP+ WAS limited to just 3 per day.
FP+ changed over time. Early FP+ was before MDE, so you couldn't even change a pass except via the in-park kiosks.
Right. It might be for some, but terrible for others. But it will always be in Disney's best interest regardless.
100% agree. And I also agree that Disney doing something good for Disney can also benefit Passholders, too.Of course it will be good for Disney. They are a business.
100% agree. And I also agree that Disney doing something good for Disney can also benefit Passholders, too.
I also believe that Disney will preferentially make changes that also benefit Passholders and other guests, all else being equal. Disney is not run by Dr. Evil (any resemblance is purely coincidental.)
I hope Disney will find a way to make this a beneficial change for most passholders, most of the time. I'm not sure they can, but it would be great if they could. I'm really curious to see what they have in store for us.
They already do that -- they have Halloween and Christmas parties. Pre-covid there was After Hours on various nights at all the parks. They are essentially night tickets. I doubt we'll see it in the manner you are really referring to though.I wonder if it will lead into day and night tickets for other guest in the future?
Hopefully we won't see it.They already do that -- they have Halloween and Christmas parties. Pre-covid there was After Hours on various nights at all the parks. They are essentially night tickets. I doubt we'll see it in the manner you are really referring to though.
We had to use our APRight now, AP holders who are not staying onsite, are limited to booking X days at once. Maybe this option allows them to book additional days but start later.
No disrespect intended but, don’t see a whole lotta that happeningIt means any AP holder who now books a whole day and doesn’t need the morning, can leave that for other pass holders who do want to go.
We had to use our AP
entitlements for upcoming stay at margaritaville resort
Decided to use an old Covid voucher from
wBC for our Xmas trip that ends on last day of sorcerer pass dates for December.
You can bet I’m keeping a close eye on the availability schedule lol
No disrespect intended but, don’t see a whole lotta that happening
WDW goers are hardwired to grab ‘the best deal’. I get it, plans change, better to cover your bases and have some flexibility as when you can enter the parks etc
I’ve never been on slinky dog either LOL. The one time my little one wanted to do the line, peak Covid, it was down.I've never been on Slinky Dog.
As an out-of-state DVC member with a current AP I’d also be happy with a pass that allows for up to 30 days/year visitation if the pricing was reasonable.There has been no info about it other than a wild rumor this could be an option.
I do not believe they will ever treat AP holders with a resort reservation different than guests who have multi day tickets.
Now I could see them creating a new level of AP that is tied to resort stays…more like a yearly pass that is not an AP but has a high number of days that can be used when a onsite guest.
As I have shared, what I need is a yearly pass with about 30 days. I don’t need an AP to use 300+ days.
But absent of that? No, I think these changes would apply when booking with your AP outside of resort reservations.
Since AP park reservations don't come from the same bucket as ticketed guests' reservations, the only way that this would benefit an on-site guest would be if Disney shrunk the all-day pool of AP reservations and gave them to the resort guest bucket.By allowing us to say we will arrive for an evening reservation, they could possibly allow another onsite guest into the park for the whole day?
Since Disney doesn't publish the size of any of these buckets, we won't necessarily know if and when they do this.Since AP park reservations don't come from the same bucket as ticketed guests' reservations, the only way that this would benefit an on-site guest would be if Disney shrunk the all-day pool of AP reservations and gave them to the resort guest bucket.