Tigger031266
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2004
- Messages
- 520
From what I understand, WDW is a larger resort than DLR. Plus, the poster stated that she primarily bought to go to wdw. In that situation, then yes, I would say buying at DLR is insane.
I would also say that if your primary reason to buy DVC was to go to Disneyland, then buying at the Beach Club would be insane. If you just want points to go to Disneyland...then either buy at VGC or find the absolutely least expensive DVC. Beach Club is not that resort.
Forgive me for using a word as strong as insane. I guess the point that I was really trying to make is that a flight to California costs several hundred dollars and takes several hours. I've been to California, but I haven't been lately.
To the OP, congratulations on making the best decision for you and your situation! DVC will always be there when the situation better works for you!
In response to this post, yes WDW IS a much larger resort than DL but I don't see how that really equates into the logic here.
My point is that everyone buys DVC for whatever reasons best suit them, and to refer to someone as "insane" (strong wording intentional or not) is not appropriate.
As a pp stated, they are primarily going to stay @ GCV but bought at BLT, they are perfectly happy with their decision and, surprisingly, don't consider that a bad decision (nor would I).
Because YOU feel that buying on one coast with visits primarily on another coast doesn't make sense, does not make it the basis for everyone else in their decision making.
I bought GCV because I love visiting DL as much (if not more than) WDW. And, this may be shocking, I've already used the majority of 2 years worth of my GCV points @ WDWI fully intended to use them @ DLR this year, but things change. And that's really the beauty of owning DVC. I am not tied to using my points anywhere, I can use them that best suits me.
I wish I could remember where I saw that picture of the guy beating the dead horsepretend that picture is here
![]()
...some posters mentioned future changes. i think that is likely too!
i know i am going to be pushing for stronger restrictions,
maybe things like limiting to 2 resorts. as far as i am concern
...we are members, and paid all this money....there is no way
those renting points & non-members should be bumping us out
of a room @ the 11 month window. then who should get the best
rooms- members or non-members? i think only members @ a
resort should be able to make room requests.....
fyi....i am not thrill with this purchase as much as my wife is.
& brought alot points to boot. on our first try, @ 9am + the
11mos window, there were no rooms & my wife was told she could
try next year. needless to say, i got involved @ this junction.
They really said it that way? Like she was entirely out of luck? That's pretty weird.
some posters mentioned future changes. i think that is likely too!
i know i am going to be pushing for stronger restrictions,
maybe things like limiting to 2 resorts. as far as i am concern
...we are members, and paid all this money....there is no way
those renting points & non-members should be bumping us out
of a room @ the 11 month window. then who should get the best
rooms- members or non-members? i think only members @ a
resort should be able to make room requests.
And only members can make reservations and communicate room requests. Can they do it FOR people? Sure! If I want to make a reservation at BLT at 11 months out for my cousins, I have a hard time seeing why that would be less important than if I were making the arrangements for ME. Er, well, for DH, as he is the member and I am the associate, LOL.
As a pp stated, they are primarily going to stay @ GCV but bought at BLT, they are perfectly happy with their decision and, surprisingly, don't consider that a bad decision (nor would I).
That someone doesn't consider it a bad decision to buy doesn't make it a good one. Not really replying to a specific situation just a general principle. Anyone can do what they want with their money but I reserve the right to formulate an opinion on any such decision posted. Just because someone is happy with their decision doesn't make it a good one, we see such situations on these BBS every day. As to whether it's appropriate to say so depends on the situation and context. There are many nuances that affect such situations, those are up to the individual to decide about their appropriateness or lack of.As a pp stated, they are primarily going to stay @ GCV but bought at BLT, they are perfectly happy with their decision and, surprisingly, don't consider that a bad decision (nor would I).
Hi from the wedding side of the board
Third point: it really comes down to OVERALL price. Yes, we could have paid a lot less for a SSR resale, but if you plan on keeping the membership for the lifetime, the greater cost is the maintenance fees. BLT is the lowest, but VGC is right next to it. Sure the fees will change, but history has shown they increase incrementally together. It makes sense that BLT and VGC are low, since the overall footprint of the resort is much smaller.
To compare, I took our purchase price at BLT and divided by the # of points and number of years (came out to $2.10 per point/per year) and added MFs (2009 was 3.69, I think). So, it came to 5.79 per point for my 2009 points. If we had bought resale at a really good price at SSR, the MFs pushed my per point price for 2009 higher than it was for BLT.
I know you ran these based on your personal situation as you should have. However, I'll point out that this is about the worst case scenario for a rental situation. You assumed $10 per point, low IMO, esp since I haven't gotten that little in several years. You used a 1 BR, worse case situation other than a GV in most cases. And you used weekends but not full weeks which gives a lower return even after both reallocations.I look at the math differently. Question is just what do the points cost to purchase, but what do those points buy you. I ran these numbers when planning out a trip for this year. DISCLAIMER: This is a quick run, I'm sure you could pick seasons and room size and change some of the ranking comparisons.
My assumptions were that the market value of a point is $10 (high-end rental) and that you were getting 2 weekend nights and 3 weekday nights in a one-bedroom. I also took the MF for each resort and multiplied it by the total points used. Here is the comparison of points and cost:
Resort/Points Rental Value MF Total Cost
SSR- 142 $1420 $616 $2036
AKL- 124 $1240 $602 $1842
BWV- 129 $1290 $672 $1962
VWL- 156 $1560 $785 $2345
BLT- 168 $1680 $616 $2296
BCV- 156 $1560 $780 $2340
OKW- 128 $1280 $606 $1896
Interesting thing I found about BWV was it seems to be one of the most expensive on weekends, but close to Value cost at AKV on weekdays.
I know you ran these based on your personal situation as you should have. However, I'll point out that this is about the worst case scenario for a rental situation. You assumed $10 per point, low IMO, esp since I haven't gotten that little in several years. You used a 1 BR, worse case situation other than a GV in most cases. And you used weekends but not full weeks which gives a lower return even after both reallocations.
But - honestly - if you are not planning on booking more than 7 months out then you should think about resale at SSR instead. A WDW property and some of the lowest dues for the FL properties. And - you should at least be able to get a contract in the low $70's/pt and maybe could even get one in the high $60's although that has apparently gotten more difficult.
That someone doesn't consider it a bad decision to buy doesn't make it a good one. Not really replying to a specific situation just a general principle. Anyone can do what they want with their money but I reserve the right to formulate an opinion on any such decision posted. Just because someone is happy with their decision doesn't make it a good one, we see such situations on these BBS every day. As to whether it's appropriate to say so depends on the situation and context. There are many nuances that affect such situations, those are up to the individual to decide about their appropriateness or lack of.
I would word it differently and I think I disagree mostly with your last statement. What I'd say is that I can only make a decision or interpretation of any situation based on the facts presented. Is it possible there are relevant facts that might affect my impression of a given situation, at times yes, often no. However, assuming one is reasonably on topic, I think it's expected the poster will supply appropriate facts and that it is appropriate to make interpretations based on the info that IS provided. IMO once the info is posted on such a BBS or email list, depending somewhat on the context, one is opening themselves up for such opinions. Again, just because someone is happy with their decision doesn't make it a good one. However, one has the right in most cases to make bad decisions, happens every day in life and on DIS.I totally agree with the majority of your post, which is the exact point I was trying to make. What may, in general, may seem like a good or bad decision, cannot be judged by someone outside of that situation, IMO.
Many people like to claim that financing a luxury purchase is a bad decision, "period." In "general" that is probably true, but for our situation, it is perfect!