iwaseeyore
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2003
- Messages
- 349
agotta said:I said I was stepping out of the conversation but my mind is just boggled at what some of you have turned this thread into. I agree that Disney's version of Business Casual differs from mine. I did not argue with that once it was posted. But, the original point of the thread was that I do not agree with it. ALSO, as stated under Disney's definition of business casual:
dress shorts, jeans....
NOT, park shorts with sneakers and t'shirts. I am pretty sure I also read somewhere that shirts had to have collars. We are all talking about 2 different things. I am, and have been, talking about people in RESORT restaurants that come in denim or mesh shorts (for example), park t's and sneakers.
I did not once infer the character of said guests, just that I didn't find it appropriate for these types of restaurants, and NO it does not follow business casual, by Disney's definition or mine.
Thank you to those who read and UNDERSTOOD my point and didn't take my words out of context, put words in my mouth or just plain belittle me.
and I thought I missed all the fun!

When you open a can of worms this is what you get. When you make statements based on your opinion and not fact this is what you get. IMHO you inferred everything you are accused of inferring and it seems many others
feel the same way.
If I'm going out after dinner I'm wearing sneakers, my $60 t shirt is what I'll wear and shorts. For the number of visits and times at signature restaurants I've don't remember seeing people dressed like you explain.
My guess is V&A has limited seating and that is why you can impose a strict dress code. The other places mentioned would not have enough people to fill it if there was a strict dress code.