steve_rob said:So basically what they are saying is that the only people who will be affected are people whose passports expire / need renewing between October 2005 and whenever the UK starts producing biometric passports (rumoured to be Spring 2006).
Luckily mine expires early 2007, otherwise I'd be looking to get mine renewed now.
steve_rob said:I certainly wouldn't want to be queuing up at the US Embassy for a visa every time I wanted to fly to the States for the next 10 years.
wendye said:I thought a visa lasted 10 years once it had been granted! This being the case you would only have to do this the once.
wendye said:I thought a visa lasted 10 years once it had been granted! This being the case you would only have to do this the once.
Which is why the US Embassy in London (and I guess a lot of other cities as well) has been apparently leading the campaign to get Congress to issue another year's delay. I guess the embassy staff realise the value of UK tourism to the States, plus they don't really want to deal with queues stretching down the street for visas every morning!alisonbestford said:Well, I can't speak for anyone else but it seems to me that, if we don't organise BioMetric passports soon, the US is going to lose an awful lot of British custom!
I can't see that many people being prepared to queue at the Embassy for hours on end, and have to cough up even more cash to go on holiday, just because the passport office, or whoever, can't keep a deadline