Trial Run for Dogs in Resort Rooms

[Ensusieasm]

Will people go off to the parks, etc. and leave their dogs in the room all day? Now I feel sorry for the dogs. And what happens when housekeeping comes? I’m just wondering why you would want to bring them if their movements will be so restricted. Better to take them somewhere they can do something.

It sounds like the old smoking and non-smoking rooms.

Yes, they will go off to the parks and leave their pets in their room. Disney is fine with this, as it is covered in Disney's rule that pets can be alone in the room for seven hours......and who's counting?

 

[Madame]

So you're saying that Disney can't make some of their resorts pet friendly now because you said so? I didn't say it was a shelter either so I'm not sure what you mean by that.

Why does everyone think it will have a negative impact on their vacations? I just do t get it. I guess I'm more easy going.

I would prefer they keep it at 1 resort, but I don’t have such a high opinion of myself that I believe Disney gives 1 fig about my opinion.

In a round about way you were implying we were bad people who should visit a dog shelter (for whatever reason), b/c we want a dog-free vacation.

We own DVC & if they expand this into the DVC resorts we will sell. Adults & children are hard enough on the resorts. I am not paying more dues so that someone can have their pet on vacation.

It would also prevent me from ever renting out my points as I can imagine being on the hook for damages done by someone’s dog - I take enough risk being the member on file with just humans in the room.

We’ve got substantial money invested in Disney, so yes I’d like to think that I can voice my opinions & defend myself from insinuations that I’m some type of animal hater - even if you don’t think my opinion is valid.

 

[jdd]

there are rooms at other resorts during our stay, but none with the same discounted rate. Any chance they'll move us without charging us the additional amount? My husband and son both highly allergic...

 

[Madame]

there are rooms at other resorts during our stay, but none with the same discounted rate. Any chance they'll move us without charging us the additional amount? My husband and son both highly allergic...

I wouldn’t hold my breath. It would seem they value four-legged guests more than two, but ask for guest services when you call to find out for sure.

 

[Mackenzie Click-Mickelson]

I don't think you can compare an animal to other stuff you take on vacation.

You said intrinsically needed.

Definition of intrinsic is: "belonging naturally; essential." Yeah I'm fairly certain a lot of people bring stuff with them on vacation that isn't essential or belonging naturally.

... Still, when the something people choose to take with them affects the well-being of those around them, it does become their business, too. It's not about judging. (Although, I don't think you can reasonably argue that a non- service dog is necessary at Disney.)

Actually it is about judging..at least to an extent. Plenty of comments have been very judgy ones without the trial having any been started and without having enough time to have even passed. You (general you) have probably been in the same vicinity as a service animal at some point and yet others have complained about pet dander, and even about not wanting service animals period and that they should go to a pet-friendly hotel. As other posters have pointed out it's probably a good idea to take a in-depth look at the hotel chains you stay at so you do make sure they are non-pet-friendly if that is not your cup of tea. Loud noises from barking;well I have been around some loud kids and some loud adults so I guess because of that and your comment it becomes my business now too what is causing the child to be really loud and why the couple is fighting about what they are fighting about. And again who am I to judge why someone has their pet with them or not? Perhaps your wording of intrinsic and necessary are more driven on my response to you.

When something can have the negative impact that this policy can and isn't intrinsically necessary, that's often a good reason not to implement it in business and in life.

Hmm well I can think of a lot of things that Disney has done in the last few years that isn't essential but they have still implemented it. Multiple things in fact that have brought on negative post after negative post. There have also been positive posts as well to those same non-essential things Disney has implemented.

 

[Ensusieasm]

there are rooms at other resorts during our stay, but none with the same discounted rate. Any chance they'll move us without charging us the additional amount? My husband and son both highly allergic...

Others on this forum have posted that they were not accommodated in the way you describe. But the only way to know for sure is to give the Disney World reservations phone line a call, and ask for a manager if necessary.

 

[Mackenzie Click-Mickelson]

Yes, they will go off to the parks and leave their pets in their room. Disney is fine with this, as it is covered in Disney's rule that pets can be alone in the room for seven hours......and who's counting?

I do think that's a very valid question. To put a time limit (rather than a "cannot leave unattended" which I believe is Universal's policy) means they should have a procedure ready (I hope and a consistent one as well). So is it that they monitor? Or is it a honor system type thing?

 

[Disneylover99]

Why does everyone think it will have a negative impact on their vacations? I just do t get it. I guess I'm more easy going.

You've read this thread. Many people have stated how it will negatively affect their vacation. You may not agree, but how do you not get it? These issues that some of us have, have nothing to do with being easy going.

 

[jdd]

I wouldn’t hold my breath. It would seem they value four-legged guests more than two, but ask for guest services when you call to find out for sure.

Planning on it first thing in the morning. Very sad to have to deal with this on what was supposed to be a magical birthday trip

Others on this forum have posted that they were not accommodated in the way you describe. But the only way to know for sure is to give the Disney World reservations phone line a call, and ask for a manager if necessary.

Yes, will most definitely ask for a manager if I have to. Hubby and I were on a plane recently with a service dog, and it wasn't pleasant for him. I really wish there was a way to be informed of that, do he could at least have taken some medication...

 

[DisneyFive]

I do think that's a very valid question. To put a time limit (rather than a "cannot leave unattended" which I believe is Universal's policy) means they should have a procedure ready (I hope and a consistent one as well). So is it that they monitor? Or is it a honor system type thing?

As things are today, there is absolutely no way that Disney can know when you leave your room so there is no way to enforce the time limit, which makes this rule just a suggestion. (and surprisingly forgiving IMO). 7 hours?

Dan

 

[Tink-osophy]

You said intrinsically needed.

Definition of intrinsic is: "belonging naturally; essential." Yeah I'm fairly certain a lot of people bring stuff with them on vacation that isn't essential or belonging naturally.

Actually it is about judging..at least to an extent. Plenty of comments have been very judgy ones without the trial having any been started and without having enough time to have even passed. You (general you) have probably been in the same vicinity as a service animal at some point and yet others have complained about pet dander, and even about not wanting service animals period and that they should go to a pet-friendly hotel. As other posters have pointed out it's probably a good idea to take a in-depth look at the hotel chains you stay at so you do make sure they are non-pet-friendly if that is not your cup of tea. Loud noises from barking;well I have been around some loud kids and some loud adults so I guess because of that and your comment it becomes my business now too what is causing the child to be really loud and why the couple is fighting about what they are fighting about. And again who am I to judge why someone has their pet with them or not? Perhaps your wording of intrinsic and necessary are more driven on my response to you.

Hmm well I can think of a lot of things that Disney has done in the last few years that isn't essential but they have still implemented it. Multiple things in fact that have brought on negative post after negative post. There have also been positive posts as well to those same non-essential things Disney has implemented.

Sigh. Like I said, I don' think you can compare dogs ( and their potential impact) with other 'non-intrinsic' ...items.

And it isn't judging to comment on things that directly impact you. It would be judging if you tried to attach subjective labels to the pets or their owners, but not simply to express concern over things like phobias, allergies, noise issues and hygiene.

And, again, Disney having made other questionable decisions isn't a reason to implement this one and certainly isn't a reason not to comment on it.

P.S. My use of intrinsic and necessary, or synonyms, are in a few of my posts, not specific to you or your post.

 

[CT Disney]

I just posted this is the Resort Club Level Thread but an putting it here too just as an fyi:


So, I just did an online chat session with Disney. Thought you all might be interested in the conversation. Here it is, exactly word-for-word:

Me: I have a question about the new dog-friendly policy at the Yacht Club Resort. If I book a club level room, will I be allowed to bring a dog?

Disney Rep: it will take me a moment to research your answer to your question. I will be right back!

Me: Thank you!

Disney Rep: Yes, all rooms are said to be available.

Me: So, I would still be placed on the regular club level floor (5th floor)? Also, can I book any room category on club level (standard view, garden view, or water view)?

Disney Rep: Yes, depending on the resorts club level usually has better views but all apply
(*Note: I typed the above response exactly as the Disney rep wrote it. Very odd wording, but I think the gist is that I can book any room category on club level)

Me: I am assuming dogs are not allowed in the club lounge?

Disney Rep: Yes they are only allowed in your room

Me: Thank you for answering my questions

Disney Rep: You're welcome. Have a magical day.


So, there you have it. Take it with a grain of salt...we all know that info can vary greatly from Disney rep to Disney rep.

For the record, I am very against allowing dogs (other than service dogs) at any resort. I was hoping that booking a club level reservation would prevent us from getting a room that had previously been occupied by someone else's pet. Guess not.

How many people who book CL and bring a dog will be taking table scraps from the lounge back to the room for their dog to eat? haha!

 

[Mackenzie Click-Mickelson]

As things are today, there is absolutely no way that Disney can know when you leave your room so there is no way to enforce the time limit.

Dan

That's more what I was thinking.

 

[LSUmiss]

This thread is really sad to read through. So much hate and negativity. This is why I say I love animals more than some humans most days.

Volunteer in a pet shelter. You might just change your mind.

I don't think one disability trumps another, and in saying that you run into the problem of telling someone they can't stay in a certain room because they have a dog. Our dogs are medical equipment and will be with us in the room, park, restaurants, and bathrooms. My dog happens to be a small medical alert dog. At restaurants he is under the table and in park he walks or if to crowded will ride in a backpack just so he is out of people's way and won't get stepped on.

This is more along the lines of the "but children do things I don't like, too". Sigh. Dogs do not equal humans.

That wasn’t that point. This was in response to ppl saying how unsanitary dogs are. Not much more things that can be as unsanitary as changing a diaper on a table. So (other than ppl with allergies) dogs in the rooms will not cause some major public health crisis like ppl are saying & will not likely even make anyone sick. But changing a diaper on the table could actually make ppl sick if it’s not cleaned properly after.

 

[MarBee]

I just posted this is the Resort Club Level Thread but an putting it here too just as an fyi:


So, I just did an online chat session with Disney. Thought you all might be interested in the conversation. Here it is, exactly word-for-word:

Me: I have a question about the new dog-friendly policy at the Yacht Club Resort. If I book a club level room, will I be allowed to bring a dog?

Disney Rep: it will take me a moment to research your answer to your question. I will be right back!

Me: Thank you!

Disney Rep: Yes, all rooms are said to be available.

Me: So, I would still be placed on the regular club level floor (5th floor)? Also, can I book any room category on club level (standard view, garden view, or water view)?

Disney Rep: Yes, depending on the resorts club level usually has better views but all apply
(*Note: I typed the above response exactly as the Disney rep wrote it. Very odd wording, but I think the gist is that I can book any room category on club level)

Me: I am assuming dogs are not allowed in the club lounge?

Disney Rep: Yes they are only allowed in your room

Me: Thank you for answering my questions

Disney Rep: You're welcome. Have a magical day.


So, there you have it. Take it with a grain of salt...we all know that info can vary greatly from Disney rep to Disney rep.

For the record, I am very against allowing dogs (other than service dogs) at any resort. I was hoping that booking a club level reservation would prevent us from getting a room that had previously been occupied by someone else's pet. Guess not.

How many people who book CL and bring a dog will be taking table scraps from the lounge back to the room for their dog to eat? haha!

I had two online conversations today about POR. One CM said that the dogs can be at any room at any time, even the upgraded “Royal Rooms.” The other one said that he was frustrated because Disney hasn’t given much information after announcing it, and he cannot find any information. Both suggested staying at a different resort to combat pet allergies.
So you can all take that fwiw as well

 

[Mackenzie Click-Mickelson]

Sigh. Like I said, I don' think you can compare dogs ( and their potential impact) with other 'non-intrinsic' ...items.

And it isn't judging to comment on things that directly impact you. It would be judging if you tried to attach subjective labels to the pets or their owners, but not simply to express concern over things like phobias, allergies, noise issues and hygiene.

And, again, Disney having made other questionable decisions isn't a reason to implement this one and certainly isn't a reason not to comment on it.

P.S. My use of intrinsic and necessary, or synonyms, are in a few of my posts, not specific to you or your post.

I didn't figure your usage of intrisitc was specific to me or my post at all but it directly related to how I responded to you. But it would appear we just have different definitions or at the very least it's being applied in a different way- just the way our minds work I guess.

It is judgy to say all dog owners would be like ____ because of past experiences or because of perceived thoughts of the trial. It is judgy to say service animals should go to pet-friendly hotel. It is judgy to say "why do you need your pet with you on vacation?" (I said I personally wouldn't bring one but I'm not judging others who do).

You can be judgy in just about any comment if you want to. It doesn't have much to do about phobias, allergies, noise issues or whatnot. I'm fairly certain I can discern between comments coming from a practical standpoint and those coming from a judgy standpoint. Someone with severe or fatal allergies is usually coming from a practical standpoint as they are trying to protect their health. Those coming from just the thought of a pet at the resort or the thought of having an area near them where a dog can be can, though may not always, be coming from a judgy standpoint. And the various other examples of which both are present on this thread.

I think we'll have to agree to disagree which is totally fine just differing opinions.

 

[DG25]

Thank you for the warning, I need to change my hotel. I have a service dog, and was going to stay at POR and POFQ, we will stay at POFQ the whole time. I already have to deal with the non service dogs, now I have to also deal with the family pet dogs, when my dog is ready to relax after hours in the parks, being on rides and in kennels, hot distracted and tired, she just wants to relax, go potty and fall asleep, now she has to deal with dog distractions all night and when she wants to walk outside in a small place near the room.

This is a very bad idea. I hate Marriott and other hotels that allow dogs, my dog has been bite, I have been bite and my dog is not capable of working when another dog who's owner can not control them gets in our face barking and not allow me blind to get away. I also feel bad, yes dogs left hours and hours in rooms alone, dogs peeing on rugs, dog poop all over the resort, stained rugs and floors, chewed furniture and so much more.

This is the worst idea I can think of. So many guest will not follow rules and everyone thinks there dog is the best, I have a $60000 trained dog, and off harness she is like any other dog and has done things wrong, I can't imagine a dog who does not have training in the resort.

 

[mickeysfavgal]

I changed from POR to POP today. The dog issue was a factor.... anyone else?

Going March 2018, I Changed from AoA Lion King Family Suite to 2 Preferred POP rooms yesterday evening. Thank goodness our trip is so far out that there was still availability at POP.
Dogs were our issue also, no one knows what to expect with this change. Was so looking forward to our first stay at AoA. Maybe in a year when this changes (and i believe it will) and WDW is finished renovating all the soiled & chewed up pet rooms (from dogs being left alone) we can book another trip at AoA.
Thanks Disney!

 

[Tink-osophy]

I didn't figure your usage of intrisitc was specific to me or my post at all but it directly related to how I responded to you. But it would appear we just have different definitions or at the very least it's being applied in a different way- just the way our minds work I guess.

It is judgy to say all dog owners would be like ____ because of past experiences or because of perceived thoughts of the trial. It is judgy to say service animals should go to pet-friendly hotel. It is judgy to say "why do you need your pet with you on vacation?" (I said I personally wouldn't bring one but I'm not judging others who do).

You can be judgy in just about any comment if you want to. It doesn't have much to do about phobias, allergies, noise issues or not. I'm fairly certain I can discern between comments coming from a practical standpoint and those coming from a judgy standpoint. Someone with severe or fatal allergies is usually coming from a practical standpoint as they are trying to protect their health. Those coming from just the thought of a pet at the resort or the thought of having an area near them where a dog can be can, though may not always, be coming from a judgy standpoint. And the various other examples of which both are present on this thread.

I think we'll have to agree to disagree which is totally fine just differing opinions.

I think we have different ideas of judgy, too! But like you said it's down to differing opinions and it's good we can express them here. Life would be very robotic if we were all the same. (That is more judgy! LOL)

 

[agavegirl1]

Thank you for the warning, I need to change my hotel. I have a service dog, and was going to stay at POR and POFQ, we will stay at POFQ the whole time. I already have to deal with the non service dogs, now I have to also deal with the family pet dogs, when my dog is ready to relax after hours in the parks, being on rides and in kennels, hot distracted and tired, she just wants to relax, go potty and fall asleep, now she has to deal with dog distractions all night and when she wants to walk outside in a small place near the room.

This is a very bad idea. I hate Marriott and other hotels that allow dogs, my dog has been bite, I have been bite and my dog is not capable of working when another dog who's owner can not control them gets in our face barking and not allow me blind to get away. I also feel bad, yes dogs left hours and hours in rooms alone, dogs peeing on rugs, dog poop all over the resort, stained rugs and floors, chewed furniture and so much more.

This is the worst idea I can think of. So many guest will not follow rules and everyone thinks there dog is the best, I have a $60000 trained dog, and off harness she is like any other dog and has done things wrong, I can't imagine a dog who does not have training in the resort.

Thank you for posting this. I have always wondered about the affect on legitimate service dogs.