Treatment of DVC members

Ok, I have a question.

I found the ADA Standards for Acceptable Design:

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adastd94.pdf

Page 45 disusses hanicaped accessibility for tubs and showers. It does not say specifically a shower must be installed instead of a tub, thus I was hoping to get your opinion on the following ideas.

1) Would you, as a DVC member, be willing to pay for upgrades to studio rooms to change the shower into a tub (HC accessible in those specific rooms if possible)?

2) Would you, as a DVC member, be willing to grant other members (and those with guests) who are in wheel chairs (and with a certified doctor's note) the right to pay Studio point costs for a 1 bedroom HC room that has shower accessibility (as well as a tub, as seems to be the current standard) in new and altered (see #1 above) DVC Resorts?

I hear the concerns, and I would like to present these solutions.

Thank you for listening! :)
 
CDSTapisRouge said:
. The manner in which is was presented was the key to making it ok for one night.

Ah....the I can't hate you because you feel my pain syndrome. :crazy:

It usually works, until the mean self-centered people show up and go right into a hissy-fit and give the other 99.9999% of the membership a bad rep.

-Joe
 
Sherri said:
I requested a non handicap room (later when I called after reading these boards) and the CM said it was fine to add it to the res.
And its strange because when we stay at the Showboat in Atlantic City (a hotel) they have handicap as a request. You do not need to specifically ask not to have handicap. Never are you given a room that is handicap if you didn't request one. Why aren't all hotels/resorts like that?

So they let handicapped rooms go empty if no one requested them? I don't think too many hotels would do that if they are soldout.
 
crisi said:
There are things DVC can do - they can make HA and NS guarenteed categories and book these rooms first come first serve (and NO switching at checkin no matter how good your reason for needing a nonsmoking room with a tub is). I think it will add overhead and much knashing of teeth at checkin as members throw fits, but maybe not. They can go back to pre-assigning rooms (for which there was MUCH complaining when you couldn't get into your room until 4pm or later), this particular problem seems to stem from stopping pre-assigning rooms. But comping rooms I am NOT for, unless you can figure out a way I don't need to pay a dime for because someone else is pickier than I am.

That sounds like a WONDERFUL idea!!! If you accept it on paper (and your confirmation could say something like, "This reservation is for a HA (or smoking) room due to limited availability at this resort"....then, that is what you get!!

The interesting thing is, I wasn't a member when the "pre-assigning" of rooms was policy, but I have stayed in two separate DVC rooms, and neither (under the "room ready" policy) were ready for me to get into until well after 4 pm. So, where is the advantage to switching to "room ready"? I just don't see it?

Greysworld - I don't understand your "1 bdrm for studio points" proposal. Could you please explain further? It seems to me that the people who would need the "1 bdrm for studio points" would be the people who are NOT disabled. HA rooms are the rooms of request for people needing them. I think it would make more sense to "subsidize" the accomodations for people not getting their request...in either "direction". However, I am not for "subsidizing" that. I think it would be much better (and cheaper) to adopt Crisi's plan above.

:wave:

Beca
 

jmminarik said:
Ah....the I can't hate you because you feel my pain syndrome. :crazy:

It usually works, until the mean self-centered people show up and go right into a hissy-fit and give the other 99.9999% of the membership a bad rep.

-Joe

AMEN...



Also, I like Crisi's plan, but Also to respond to Grey's proposal. I think what he is saying is make all studios back to regular rooms and if someone calls that needs an accessible room (they would be doing so through the special needs department, not at the request of Member services) then they would be able to get a 1 bedroom for the points of a studio for their needs. Being that it is going through special needs and not MS they require follow up to verify that it is in fact a medical need, they don't just take your word on it. I think that is a good idea too. I know at WL (not the villas just the main lodge)... if you have a family of 4 and are in need of an accessible room you pay for one room and get the second free. WL accessible rooms are ALL king beds. So for a family you would need to have the connecting room in order to accomodate. So the special needs department will book the rooms for them with the king accessible and the 2 queen connector and they are only charged for one room. I don't know how fessible it would be to change the studios over, and implement the plan, but based on WDW past practice (as I stated above) the idea sounds good.
 
Debbie- We never pay for our rooms at the showboat they are always comp. And they always accomadate us. As far as letting rooms that are handicap go unused, there are LOTS of senior citizens that fill those rooms. I know they have been to sold out capacity before, but I think they pretty much please everyone. And yes, even as non paying guests our requests of non smoking or being near an elevator or top floor are always met, and with a smile. Sounds like we are in for a rude awakening (from what i'm reading) when we check into Disney.
 
Maybe I'm the only dissenter here. But, I don't see why the staff had an attitude. I do, however, believe asking for a manager when you don't like the policy is a bit attitudish.

HA rooms do get filled if there are no non-HA rooms. I suspect the same is true for smoking rooms. If you don't like your room, you should pay a change fee. After all, it is a matter of preference. If you can't survive a few days with only a shower......

I'm put on my flame suit now.
 
/
Crisi, you made an excellent point re DVC members subsidizing 'free lunches'.
"Remember, we own DVC as much as Disney does. We own all the units except the developer inventory. They run it at a predefined and legal profit margin in terms of management fees - if costs go up, our dues or something else we pay for go up - they aren't going to "eat" a darn thing. If DVC gives away rooms, that means it comes from somewhere - trades suddenly become even more expense, higher dues, perhaps ROFR numbers going up along with the cost of add ons - but one way or another, once we signed the contract and until we sign - there is no free lunch. And the few "free" lunches I'm subsidizing I want to be for truly horrible things "

And, sadly, without paying a fortune in accurate accounting, it is probably the DVC members that would get charged for comps by DIsney aka Disney management....But the bylaws and contract for management should clearly state that if Disney management comps Mickey's or upgrades etc, that Disney pays for same. THat is a management elected expense...just as if an employee of Disney were to sue for liability, the DVC owners should be protected from same.

Did I read that out of say 1000 DVC 'units' that DIsney keeps some for cash rental? Then those should be the units that are comped or upgraded. Also, how many nights are ALL the DVC units/cash units really sold out completely?
I think if a DVC member requests a nonsmoking studio and there really isn't any member or cash studios that are nonsmoking available BUT there is a 1 bedroom available...then that room should be made available because it otherwise woudl be sitting empty. (Forgive me if I have the 'cash rental' part misconstrued...I am assuming that the cash goes to Disney but perhaps it is cash that goes into the DVC costs pot)

Additionally, in the resorts that combine Disney rooms (BC and YC and BWI) with DVC in the same resort, if a room was guaranteed smoking and non was available in a DVC unit, then the member should be given an option of a DIsney owned YC< BC OR BWI room....without kitchen, yes, but it is a fair one night trade...again at DIsney expense tho in such cases the offered room was an 'extra' unoccupied unit anyway and not be charged back to the DVC owners.

Bottom line: we are at the mercy of Disney management being honest about these things. I am jaded enough to believe that if one of Mikies friends was coming to visit and there was a beautiful GV empty...that Mikie might let the friend stay in the unit and never comp back the members of DVC anything for it....So it goes, it isn't a perfect world. I imagine it is the nature of timeshare to have these problems, especially when there are nontimeshare units in the sme resort and management/use fees are 'split'....we just have to deal with it, like the other nonperfect things in life.
At the same time, there is nothing wrong with asking questions and communicating concerns to 'management'.

I agree with the people who were nicely told that unfortunately there were no nonsmoking rooms....but here's what we can do. Why in Mickey's name would any CM be allowed to do otherwise...that is the JOB of hotel management: to use words of compassion and accountabilty for the problem...hiring CMs that are 'blamers' rather than 'solvers' is problematic. Many of us need to be taught that our position demands certain nuances of speech. So a front desk person might need to be taught how to appease in a win/win sort of way instead of inflame a customer in a lose/lose way simply in tone or choice of words. Ok...lets get Covey to become a DVC member!!!!

I really do think that DIsney will listen and maybe even change a few policies IF it can be done without drastically affecting bottom line. We just have to be willing to be a reasonable yet unyielding thorn in their side.

I read on another thread that there are currently 87,000 DVC members. That is a pretty powerful group , if united.

I can certainly get a doctor...the dreadful X....to write a script that I must have a bathtub for my mental health (he might say: or else I go nuts) :rotfl2:
Do you think that might assure me of a room with a tub? :rotfl:

Finally...I would be willing to stay the first night off property at a cheapie motel because I usually get in late (flying west to east) IF you REALLY think that checking in very early might make a difference...So I guess I could take advantage of cheaper air on Saturday and then stay Sat at a motel to avoid using twice the points as weekdays. Are you pretty sure that if I checked in at say, 7;00am that when it came to unit assignments, I would be given first crack? (Does anyone know this for sure?)

Well, I am sorry that anyone gets treated poorly by front desk CMs. I was treated so, as a cash customer at AKL in December too. Mayhaps I could get gainful employment in setting up Disney Magic classes in guest relations for front desk personel!!!! I actually think Disney does offer these training classes to employees...maybe some CMs just need a little refresher course.

Fondly to all!
Colorado Belle
 
It's too bad the OP had a bad experience. I have always had fairly good experiences at DVC properties. We had a tough check-in at CSR last time...something about the way they told me to make the reservation which precluded them from being able to give us charging priveleges on the room key...not that bg of a deal, but while the CM checking us in was lovely, the supervisor of the check-in area seemed to not want to have anything to do with the problem.

I've always had good luck with DVC properties. I've always been able to get what I requested. I have had HA rooms on occasion, but they don't bother me so it wasn't an issue. I think if I did REALLY need a bathtub in my room, I would probably ask that it be put that way as a request. I do think that at times they should be overseeing how they assign rooms. A few years back at the BCV, we had a 1BR for a couple of nights, then were needing a 2BR because more family was joining us. When we checked ion, I asked if the 1BR coiuld be connected to a studio lock-off so we could just "expand" into the studio when we needed to start the 2BR space. Unfortunately, the studio lock-off next to our 1BR had already been booked, so we ended up moving. Not as huge deal, but I can't help but wonder if someone had looked at the reservations perhaps they would have thought of that and given that studio to someone who was checking out the day we needed to start our 2BR stay, instead of to folks who were goig to be there right through.

Sometimes common sense isn't so common.
 
Someone stated, why not pay for the room change fee if you don't like your room? Well if you request non handicap and the room you are assigned is handicap, why should you pay to switch when you asked for non handi cap in the first place?
 
What if you request a non handicap room but get one. For not having a tub (for young kids) or having too soft of a mattress for back problems maybe they should put a couple points per day that you were put out and made miserable back into your account.
 
"A tub or not a tub" has become quite an issue! I will only point out one thing in defense of the tub people. If you look through your DVC membership books you find ALL floor layouts show -- A TUB! So why are these DVC members the bad guys for thinking that is what they were getting. In fact there are several other "out of the norm" changes in a HA room, that might make it difficult for many others, example: a family of four. The point is, it is not what you were lead to believe you were reserving, upon arrival is too late.

I wouldn't think it to be a problem for the reservation person to inform you that HA rooms are all that is available at time of booking. If you are Okay with that GREAT! If not, you have the opportunity to book somewhere else.

Why is not wanting to stay in a HA room or a non-smoking room make us bad guys?

Who complained about the 4:00 check-in????

I would much rather have a room I will enjoy and wait until 4:00 to get it. This first available completly does away with advantage of booking 11 months in advance at your home resort, where YOU put your money.
 
I believe there would be unhappy members with either a request or a guaruntee system. People do get upset when they don't get their requests, I.e. this thread. I think there will also be members upset if their guaruntee failed due to the last avail requested room being taken out of service for some reason. If we're upset over 'requests' that DVC states have no guaruntee, wait 'til a guaruntee is not met. It's a slippery slope.
 
ColoradoBelle1,

DVC (or DVD, I'm not clear which - and its probably important for this discussion) retains 3% of inventory for maintenance. If they use that inventory to make sure we don't get HA rooms, only HA rooms will ever get painted!

Cash rooms come primarily through trade outs. If I book a cruise through MS for points, MS resells those points to CRO and then gives that money to DCL for my cruise. So DVC doesn't "own" any rooms for cash points to give us - those have already been spent for my cruise!

DVC was designed by Disney (and Florida state timeshare law) to be a nearly zero sum game once the units are sold from a profit standpoint. We'd like "Disney" to pay for this, but there is no way "Disney" can or will - after the sale, their profit is specified by contract. If we want it, we need to pay for it somehow. The question is "who pays?" Won't be Disney, it will be the members in some fashion. Currently its usually the people checking in late. We could move that to the people who book late (I have come to agree that is more fair). Or we could share it all equally through some sort of dues increase or exchange increase to either let those rooms sit empty, or "incentivize" them.

I'm really leery of a point reduction for the rooms. They are there for a reason, and they don't need to get snapped up by non-handicapped bargain hunters who don't care if they have a tub or not. Besides, we all still pay for that, since a point reduction one place means a point increase another.

(BTW, I agree snotty CM behavior is unacceptable).
 
Sherri said:
What if you request a non handicap room but get one. For not having a tub (for young kids) or having too soft of a mattress for back problems maybe they should put a couple points per day that you were put out and made miserable back into your account.
Sherri, I'd politely suggest that your experiences at hotel/casinos (such as Harrahs Showboat in AC) has colored your understanding of what a time-share can offer. There are strict rules about the point cost of each and every DVC villa, and no one has the "magic wand" rights to change that. Also, timeshares - at least DVC timeshares - are set up to have as close to to 100% occupancy as possible, so there's only a limited number of "top floor", "by the elevator", "great view", etc. rooms.

Not to pick on you - honest - but as a frequent Las Vegas visitor, I understand the power that a casino host & a check-in clerk can have; there's no similar situation at DVC. (BTW, your room wasn't unpaid for; if it was "comped", it was paid for by the casino).

While I have noticed an increase in these kinds of comments here in the DVC forums, I have no idea if the problems have gotten worse or if more people have found this forum to air their complaints. While I'm sure that some individual complaints are quite genuine, I'm less sure if there's really a trend. Some new owners may be expecting the same amenities - and "inconvenience compensation" - as a Deluxe WDW Resort. Some old-time owners might be fondly recalling "the good old days" that weren't nearly as good as the fog of time have rendered them. Maybe the Disney bean-counters are starting to believe that Disney can offer a little less magic and still have a strong bottom line. Maybe it's harder to get new CM hires willing to be cheerful & magical for whatever wage Disney pays. Maybe DVC owners are starting to learn the ins and outs of the DVC system - just like Disney-philes have figured out how to "game the system" - to maximize their own benefits. Probably a little of all of the above.

Good luck to all of you in either getting Disney to make the changes you want or in managing your expectations so that you're happy with what you get.

Be well!

IMHO - YMMV
 
I just talked to Carlie; our DVC members satisfaction rep. She heard my concerns.

Yes, the earlier you arrive the better chance you have at getting what you want. The 11 month booking only gives you a room, as far as preferences, first come first served (except in the case of medical reasons). I asked why the switch from two day advance assignment where they took into account each persons prefernces to this "ready room" thing. She assured me that they have had better response and people don't care as much about "preferences" as much as they do "ready now" or first available.

But, what that means for us who are flying in or traveling a good distance is the later we check in the less likley we are to get our request, and the more booked they are, the more likly we will get a smoking; HA room that overlooks the dumpsters. :earboy2: Just kidding, but checking-in early does appear to be way more important than in past years.

I also mentioned the, occasional, attitude of the CM's. I told her after reading all these replies, I see it is a little on both sides. However, she replied with a, no it is not; a cm should never treat a guest poorly. She said she would mention it to the hotel managers and encourage them to encourage the check-in CMs to treat us the same as "cash people". :love2:

So, on that note, I would like to encourage us to do the same; that is, be nice. :teeth:
 
So this brings me around to asking (since check in is 4:00 p.m.) what time are we supposed to show up to attempt to get our requests taken care of? 4:00 pm? Earlier "just in case" the rooms are ready? Before 9 pm?

I think lots of people already don't use DVC if they are getting in late. They check into another hotel in the area and them move the next day - for this very reason.
 
DrTomorrow said:
While I have noticed an increase in these kinds of comments here in the DVC forums, I have no idea if the problems have gotten worse or if more people have found this forum to air their complaints. While I'm sure that some individual complaints are quite genuine, I'm less sure if there's really a trend. Some new owners may be expecting the same amenities - and "inconvenience compensation" - as a Deluxe WDW Resort. Some old-time owners might be fondly recalling "the good old days" that weren't nearly as good as the fog of time have rendered them. Maybe the Disney bean-counters are starting to believe that Disney can offer a little less magic and still have a strong bottom line. Maybe it's harder to get new CM hires willing to be cheerful & magical for whatever wage Disney pays. Maybe DVC owners are starting to learn the ins and outs of the DVC system - just like Disney-philes have figured out how to "game the system" - to maximize their own benefits. Probably a little of all of the above.

ITA!!! I think it is ALL of the above!!!

:wave:

Beca
 
Question:

If my flight leaves Devner at 6pm (honest, this isn't an SAT question :teacher: :p ) and arrives in Orlando at 1am. Can I call the DVC resort check-in desk during my layover or before taking off to ask my name be placed on the list for getting room assignments? This may take care of some issues we have discussed with first-in best-room.

Second, I am unclear why Disney made all of the HC studios with a shower only. According to the rules from the ADA, a hanicapped enabled tub would have been just as good and that would certainly remove half of this discussion (which is why I asked earlier if we, as members, would be willing to pay for the change from shower to tub or compensate HC shower people with a room upgrade if we put regular tubs in the studios).

Lastly, maybe DVC should buy a truck load of small inflatable pools for the HC showers, so those wich a bath can have one!! :bitelip: Yeah, they can be stored in the hall closet or something!!
 
That is a good idead, why waste the points for a late night? Well, except that you can get in and settled... hummm personal preference I guess, I'll have to think about that.

Anyway, from what I understand, whatever room is available when you get there, you can have. That means if you get there at 8:00 am and a room is available you can have it. If you get there and the room that is available is not what you want, you can put in your request, and as soon as one that meets your request comes available , you get it. She said it all depends on the time people vacate their rooms, and if "available" is more important than "preferences" to you. (not a quote; a paraphase)

I, personally interpret this to mean, get there early, if you have strong preferences.

Official check-in is still 4:00. That means rooms are not guarenteed to ready until then.

We got our room at PO at about 1:00ish in Feb. but we took what we got, we did not request anything.
 















New Posts





DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top