You're a top bloke llama.I'll have an "official" statement in the morning. But for now, here's all you need to know...
-I've got basketball on my TV screen
-The bourbon is flowing
-I'm wearing silk pants
-I'm eating marshmallows straight from the bag
So yeah....ol' Bob is flat killing it right about now.
Don't worry about Staggsy. I've set him up like a champ on his way out. Ten polo shirts emblazoned with the Dixie Landings logo, lifetime passes to the Spirit of Aloha Luau, a Dole Whip machine for home use, and as many DVD copies of "Bolt" as he can fit in the Rubbermaid tote we loaned him. The works, really.
I did not think Skaggs was ever going to get the top spot. Disney needs a "Jonathon Tisch" type running the company.
I just caught wind of this - Disney released a statement about 10 minutes ago:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160404006630/en/
I feel a great disturbance in the Force...
I'm a stockholder, and I'd vote for ya!Time to update my resume.
I think it's clear who they want in that role:ooh....Can hardly wait to hear Pete's take on this one. The Shanghai Disney situation may have played a part. When I heard that the opening day tix sold out in hours my first thought was " they left money on the table." If they sold out in hours, that means they could have priced them higher and people still would have bought them. Can't wait to see who might be in line for the throne.
Yeah but then they'd have to deal with everyone crying that they're just out to make money and don't care about the people who can't afford to go to a Disney park.ooh....Can hardly wait to hear Pete's take on this one. The Shanghai Disney situation may have played a part. When I heard that the opening day tix sold out in hours my first thought was " they left money on the table." If they sold out in hours, that means they could have priced them higher and people still would have bought them. Can't wait to see who might be in line for the throne.
Shanghai is definitely a large part in this. I don't think they left money on the table. The tickets are priced for the Chinese not Americans. You have to think about their economy and income. Opening day was bound to sell out pretty much no matter what anyways,ooh....Can hardly wait to hear Pete's take on this one. The Shanghai Disney situation may have played a part. When I heard that the opening day tix sold out in hours my first thought was " they left money on the table." If they sold out in hours, that means they could have priced them higher and people still would have bought them. Can't wait to see who might be in line for the throne.
Shanghai is definitely a large part in this. I don't think they left money on the table. The tickets are priced for the Chinese not Americans. You have to think about their economy and income. Opening day was bound to sell out pretty much no matter what anyways.ooh....Can hardly wait to hear Pete's take on this one. The Shanghai Disney situation may have played a part. When I heard that the opening day tix sold out in hours my first thought was " they left money on the table." If they sold out in hours, that means they could have priced them higher and people still would have bought them. Can't wait to see who might be in line for the throne.
It sounds like from this article that Iger was also behind the whole MM+ initiative, but Staggs was the one who pitched it to the board and oversaw the projectIf I recall, it was Staggs who'd pushed this initiative in the beginning and Iger had something in a big meeting to him to the effect of "this better work."
For the pitch itself, Iger turned to Tom Staggs, the chairman of Disney’s Parks and Resorts division, who had overseen the MyMagic+ initiative for the last year. Staggs gave opening remarks about the program.
The board broke into applause, and the meeting came to its close. The directors were chatting and readying to leave when Iger, aware of the challenges still ahead for MyMagic+, regained the attention of the small room. He looked directly at Staggs. "This better work," he said, bluntly and sternly. "This better work."
The theater was quiet, the elation gone. Iger repeated, "This better work."
I've seen that before in person. Three months ago we had a CEO, COO, and CIO. The CIO wanted to be CEO. The CEO didn't like him (a lot of people didn't like him) so the CIO left. The COO was supposed to take over but he waslooking at retirement, not taking over for the 70 year old CEO. On top of that the COO and the CEO were very different people.Forbes has an interesting article on the failed succession.
I've seen that before in person. Three months ago we had a CEO, COO, and CIO. The CIO wanted to be CEO. The CEO didn't like him (a lot of people didn't like him) so the CIO left. The COO was supposed to take over but he was looking at retirement, not taking over for the 70 year old CEO. On top of that the COO and the CEO were very different people.
After the CIO left, the IT sector imploded into a morass of backstabbing that reminded me of Lord of the Flies. The CEO thought he could fix it better than the COO (who was the former CIO). Needless to say he made things worse. The CEO and COO had a falling out, the COO "retired" leaving the CEO to try and fix the mess he created. The pressure cracked him, he did a lot of crazy things, and the board kicked him out.
Not we don't have a CEO, we have a CAO (chief admin officer) who took over everything, and we have someone who was forced to become the CIO despite the fact that he said he didn't want it and wants to leave.
Bad decisions at the top can quickly spin out of control. I figure it will be five years before we have a long term CEO, COO and CIO again. In the meantime I'm hiding under my desk, sharpening sticks, and smearing black paint on my face.