That was possibly illegal (not paying for travel).flying in Sunday night......off the clock, so without pay........but they would pick up the tab for dinner and a movie and of course an extra night in the hotel.
Union contract allowed it. And it was only allowed if the employees requested it.That was possibly illegal (not paying for travel).
Union doesn't overrule a law. I'm sure someone could have fought it if they wanted to.Union contract allowed it. And it was only allowed if the employees requested it.
Generally if you are a passenger and it is outside of your normal working hours, the company does not need to pay you for that time.That was possibly illegal (not paying for travel).
If that's the law, that's bad (IMO). You're still doing something for the company, you should be paid.Generally if you are a passenger and it is outside of your normal working hours, the company does not need to pay you for that time.
This actually only applies to people who are paid hourly.If that's the law, that's bad (IMO). You're still doing something for the company, you should be paid.
Well, collective bargaining agreements often differ from the law. That's one of reasons collective bargaining agreements exist, to spell out working conditions that differ from what the law requires. And it isn't like we weren't being compensated. We traded 3-4 hours of overtime for traveling on our day off for a $50 meal stipend and an extra night in the hotel. I was making $5.50 an hour at the time, so just the meal stipend was more than the wage I would have earned. And I didn't have to get up at 3 am on Monday morning to catch a 6 am flight to be in LA at 7 am and at my assignment by 8 am, I could sleep a few hours later and get up at 7 am.Union doesn't overrule a law. I'm sure someone could have fought it if they wanted to.
Think about it, someone stays an extra hour to finish a project. If they "requested" it, the employer doesn't have to pay them?
Well, collective bargaining agreements often differ from the law. That's one of reasons collective bargaining agreements exist, to spell out working conditions that differ from what the law requires. And it isn't like we weren't being compensated. We traded 3-4 hours of overtime for traveling on our day off for a $50 meal stipend and an extra night in the hotel. I was making $5.50 an hour at the time, so just the meal stipend was more than the wage I would have earned. And I didn't have to get up at 3 am on Monday morning to catch a 6 am flight to be in LA at 7 am and at my assignment by 8 am, I could sleep a few hours later and get up at 7 am.
Prior to covid, I traveled 2-3 days per week. My company had 50+ manufacturing locations around the country, so it took a lot of time getting around to them. Honestly... it depends on the job.Windering what you do in your downtime.
My current job has me traveling about 25% of the year. I'm by myself. At the work site for most of the day, take off around 4-5, depending on how things go.
If the weather is decent, I'll try to find a park and go for a 1-2 mile walk. If it's not good, I try to find a mall and do a couple laps.
Most sight seeing things are closed (or closing soon) by then. Plus, I'm cheap unless it's something I'm REALLY interested in.
The rest of the time is sitting in the hotel watching Netflix or other streaming.
I'm not a big drinker, so sitting at a bar isn't my idea of "fun" (at least by myself). I don't dance (cue HSM fans), and am not nearly as athletic as I should be (no longer golf... I sucked when I WAS playing).
Anyway, what do you do to kill evenings?
Nope, I've been pretty much on my own since training (over a year ago). I do think it would be nice to have a travelling partner at least occasionally, but can't justify the cost.I find that the time spent with co-workers (or clients or whatever) like this can be invaluable. When you travel, is it not an option to have some informal time with folks to build rapport?
What I mean is, when you travel... you are traveling to meet with people, I assume? Is it not an option to spend the evening with someone from that company, for instance?Nope, I've been pretty much on my own since training (over a year ago). I do think it would be nice to have a travelling partner at least occasionally, but can't justify the cost.
Well, the compensation offered is greater than the salary, so technically it is a step up.IDK, but it seems unusual that a collective bargaining agreement has the power in and of itself to override protections afforded by law. Generally the law is the baseline, the minimum standard and a collective bargaining agreement asks for further protections and benefits.
It is. And depending on who I'm working with, I have gone to lunch with them. USUALLY my day ends at least 30-60 minutes before theirs. It's kind of hard (for me) to say "hey, you want to go get a drink?". I also know what it's like being on the other side, and having family (or other) obligations, and just want to separate from work.What I mean is, when you travel... you are traveling to meet with people, I assume? Is it not an option to spend the evening with someone from that company, for instance?
Well, the compensation offered is greater than the salary, so technically it is a step up.
But, I am not a lawyer and it appears even today collective bargaining contracts can differ from labor law. Currently in California EVERY worker is required to get a meal break of at least 30 minutes, that break can't be taken before you have worked 3 hours, and can't be taken without penalty after 5 hours. You can not waive your meal break, or take at the beginning or end of your work day. My non-union shop followed that the law to the letter, after paying to pay penalties for not doing so. My wife's shop was union, and the company, the union and the employees all voted to allow workers to waive a meal break and work 8 straight without penalty. It's been in their contract for years now, and a whole lot of lawyers were involved in putting that in the contract, and so far, 10 years or so later, it has not been challenged.
A collective bargaining agreement is basically all about pay scales and working conditions, and many of those working conditions are also covered by labor law. So it would be normal in my experience to find things in a union contract that differ from the law. That's why collective bargaining agreements exsits.I didn't say collective bargaining agreements couldn't differ from labor law. I said I find it unusual that a collective bargaining agreement would (or could) override labor laws, as the laws are usually the minimum and collective bargaining usually asks for more protections and more compensation. Not a lawyer, but a quick search returned multiple results a bit different than what you outlined regarding breaks and lunches, including several from CA government sources.