Count me as another that will vote for whichever one wins...
...HOWEVER...I am a firm believer in discounting the votes in Michigan and Florida. The simple fact is that the establishment candidate - and that'd be Hillary, for those not paying attention - has a huge advantage if there is no campaigning allowed. I mean, Barack's name wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, for crying out loud (ETA: Gee...why was Hillary's, when none of the other candidates were? And how can that be a "win"?). I would again point to the posts earlier that say that the more people are exposed to Barack, the more likely they are to vote for him. He didn't have that opportunity in either of those two states. It's not about disenfranchising anyone. It's about making the contest fair for everyone involved.
If the Democratic Party includes those votes, I'll be awfully tempted to cast a grand total of one vote on election day. It will be for Hillary. As for the DNC...well, let's just say that the poor kid that called my house the other day looking for a donation got a bit of an earfull, so I doubt they'll be calling again any time soon.
The only fair way to do it would be to hold another primary or caucus in each state, and IMHO, the DNC should pay for it in total. If you can't make it to the polls, that's just too bad. I'm sure someone that couldn't make it last time will be glad to have the opportunity.
I'm dead serious about this...if they count those votes and it pushes a trailing Hillary ahead of Barack, the DNC and DCCC have seen the last dime from me they'll get until Dean is gone, at the very least.