Would be interesting to see how that played out (though I hope JE comes over to Barack's camp as well, obviously).
Anything is possible in politics.
Would be interesting to see how that played out (though I hope JE comes over to Barack's camp as well, obviously).
You've got too many zeros.She won by 57,900, not 579,000. Rather large difference.
you are rightto much DISing....but she still got more votes
![]()
Also, I was unable to find on that blog where it said that they were only looking at the voters on Tuesday, and not including early submittals. I know that the California numbers include absentee ballots, and I'm sure other states did as well.
And if Al Gore is endorsing Barack...well, Hillary might just be done. Big Al's weight has grown considerably (no, I mean in the party) over the last few years, and his endorsement would just further fuel the ridiculous momentum swing that has happened in the last couple weeks.

You've got too many zeros.She won by 57,900, not 579,000. Rather large difference.
Also, I was unable to find on that blog where it said that they were only looking at the voters on Tuesday, and not including early submittals. I know that the California numbers include absentee ballots, and I'm sure other states did as well.
And if Al Gore is endorsing Barack...well, Hillary might just be done. Big Al's weight has grown considerably (no, I mean in the party) over the last few years, and his endorsement would just further fuel the ridiculous momentum swing that has happened in the last couple weeks.
to much DISing....but she still got more votes
to much DISing....but she still got more votes
[/QUOTE]Hmmm....I'll have to think about that, but my initial reaction is "Edwards simply doesn't carry the same weight as Al." (again...no pun intended) Yes, it might sway some to Hillary's side, but I think a lot of Edwards supporters - of which I am one, though I was already leaning towards Barack before Edwards got out of the race - will find the optimistic message that Barack has to be more appealing than Hillary's pragmatism.
....
But did she get more votes from those that voted on Tuesday, not weeks ago? That's my question, and I don't think that site answers it.
Did you see this story yet on January sales figures? Where are those clowns who say the economy is just great? I particularly love the ones who say the economy isn't bad, the whole thing is made up by the media.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080207/retail_sales.html
THE RECESSION is here!I started this thread this am, and it died a slow death!THE RECESSION is here!
http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1713468
It's just the usual suspect (s). We can handle her (them). We Libs have had plenty of practice, right Unc?![]()

I think it's because most people already know we're in a recession. Even the ones that won't admit it.

Speaking of the usual suspects, you know even if God himself declares a recesssion, they will deny it till the cows come home......that is until the very second a Democrat is sworn in as POTUS. Then, I'm sure they'll proclaim that we are suddenly on the brink of an economic disaster.![]()
Speaking of the usual suspects, you know even if God himself declares a recesssion, they will deny it till the cows come home......that is until the very second a Democrat is sworn in as POTUS. Then, I'm sure they'll proclaim that we are suddenly on the brink of an economic disaster.![]()

Speaking of the usual suspects, you know even if God himself declares a recesssion, they will deny it till the cows come home......that is until the very second a Democrat is sworn in as POTUS. Then, I'm sure they'll proclaim that we are suddenly on the brink of an economic disaster.![]()