If the employer isn’t paying for your lunch you don’t go. They are required to give you lunch time. They can’t mandate where you take that personal time.And I've asked my employer to keep the meals out at 2 per week. They were wanting to do more. But I told them I couldn't afford that (I just hope that doesn't lead to me losing my job).
Ordinarily, I would agree with this if you're working for a large company. But if you work for a small entity, rocking the boat could put your performance under a microscope. You don't get fired for rocking the boat. You get fired for not dotting every i and crossing every t. I don't know the OP's work situation but there must be something that makes him concerned for his job if he pushes back too much.If the employer isn’t paying for your lunch you don’t go. They are required to give you lunch time. They can’t mandate where you take that personal time.
Is it just coworkers going to lunch, or how does this come up..? Mine go almost every day, so there is pressure there, but I bring my lunch and only go out when and if I want to. Is going out required or just implied..?And I've asked my employer to keep the meals out at 2 per week. They were wanting to do more. But I told them I couldn't afford that (I just hope that doesn't lead to me losing my job).
It’s probably best if WDW_fan_in_TX responds, but we have discussed this topic several times in another thread. It sounds like a mandatory lunch meeting at a restaurant where everyone has to pay their own way. I don’t recall if clients are involved, but it definitely sounds like something that should be reimbursed.Is it just coworkers going to lunch, or how does this come up..? Mine go almost every day, so there is pressure there, but I bring my lunch and only go out when and if I want to. Is going out required or just implied..?
Gotcha... that is highly unusual. It is usually the opposite... if you are required to work through lunch, dinner or any other meal where I am at they grant you a per diem to pay for the meal or pay for whatever you order if they are there. If we are actively working through it, whether with other folk or not, they ALSO pay overtime for that time since they are keeping you from your mandated off time.It’s probably best if WDW_fan_in_TX responds, but we have discussed this topic several times in another thread. It sounds like a mandatory lunch meeting at a restaurant where everyone has to pay their own way. I don’t recall if clients are involved, but it definitely sounds like something that should be reimbursed.
Gotcha... that is highly unusual. It is usually the opposite... if you are required to work through lunch, dinner or any other meal where I am at they grant you a per diem to pay for the meal or pay for whatever you order if they are there. If we are actively working through it, whether with other folk or not, they ALSO pay overtime for that time since they are keeping you from your mandated off time.
That’s crazy and makes me glad I don’t work in TX.I think it's interesting to note-the o/p works in Texas which has not so much as a law that requires a private employer to offer a lunch OR 'coffee' breaks. most of us take these for granted but there's no requirement under federal law so Texas follows it.
That is seriously blowing my mind.... seems like abuse when you've lived on the other side!I think it's interesting to note-the o/p works in Texas which has not so much as a law that requires a private employer to offer a lunch OR 'coffee' breaks. most of us take these for granted but there's no requirement under federal law so Texas follows it.
That is seriously blowing my mind.... seems like abuse when you've lived on the other side!