Jen: I'm so, so sorry to hear about your mother. PD and prayers for her, you, and your whole family. I'll be thinking good thoughts that she'll get the best possible treatment in the ICU, for an surgery without complications, and for a quick and painless recovery.

It sounds as if they're putting a good surgery team together, so that's good news. Please, please, please let us know if you need anything.
On to lighter topics:
Maria: Oh, I don't think you scared anyone away--it was me and my massive posting. (Don't worry, folks, my output dies down with the start of a new semester.

) And I don't think you're an opinionated--or overopinionated--reader. I don't think it's a good book discussion until someone throws their hands up and says, "I can't believe you just said that," another person downs their glass of wine in one shot, and a third starts confessing their deep, deep identification or crush on the protagonist! I'd love to have you in a book club because you'd make me think harder about things--including the relationship between Jersey big hair and its Pittsburgh version. (Not that there's anything wrong with big hair--I'm just too lazy to style mine.)
I do hope your dizziness is mostly gone. I can't imagine going to work if standing and moving were difficult. And are things going well for you this week at work?
Julie: I'm so glad you liked dingoes. I giggled like a schoolgirl when I wrote it--because I'm not very mature, I guess. So Stephanie is an average Jersey girl, huh?

Wow, what I don't know about regional differences! (Or maybe that's the Boston p.o.v. talking?

) Regardless, remind me not to go rooting around in your cookie jar any time soon.
Good, good news about the hamstring. Have you been doing regular stretching as well as drinking?

Stretching enough, and properly, is something I tend to shirk, too much. I keep reminding myself of the wisdom and lessons of Panda Dave. I fully credit him with my recent lack of shin-split pain.
Mel: Thanks for asking about my dad. It's difficult to talk about, because he's now decided not to talk with me or my brother about things. All part of the coping, I guess, and pretty consistent with the family dynamics. (I know I'm the pot calling the kettle black by complaining he's not talking to me about his treatment; I did the same thing.) All I know is that he's doing the radiation seeds and is supposed to start treatment in August. Please keep him in your thoughts and my mom too, as she has to live with him.
Also, thanks for the heads-up on Rice's website. For some reason I never think to see what authors might say on their websites. Finally, how did your R&R/recovery work. Are you back to running?
Johanna: Nothing, nothing to forgive! We welcome you back to posting, and none of us think you're a slacker! I just hope nothing bad has kept you away from your cousins--just fun, sun, and relaxation! That said, I think Kayci's entirely right in that margaritas are ALWAYS welcomed.

(She's a girl after my own heart.)
Kayci: I'm so sorry to hear about your calf injury! I hope it's not a tear, just because that sounds serious. Maybe I should say I hope whatever it is, it's not serious. I'm glad you have a doctor who's also a runner--I bet you don't need to hear endless admonitions about how bad running is for your joints.

How many fall races do you have planned again?
I love your reading list. I try to balance my literary reads with light and fluffy. And I just can't handle the heavy stuff the way
Maria can! (I skim.) I haven't started the Twilight series, in part because I like to do what you do--read a series straight through. I tried to do it with Harry Potter, but mistakenly started after book 6 was released. The wait for 7 wasn't pretty. But Nancy convinced me to give Meyers a try, even thought I'm one for action-oriented vampire books rather than romance.
JenB: What a wonderfully empathetic, articulate post to Jen.
PSA: The weekly thread has warnings to get your marathon weekend accommodations soon. Apparently, things are filling up. Hopefully, you've been smarter than me and have already made your reservations.
Robert: How are you feeling about your upcoming performance at the DL 1/2?
Christa: I just checked your WO log--congrats on your lead part, and take advantage of your rest day! JRT???
Shell: How's your R&R? Is surgery scheduled?
Corrina: I know you're journalling, but thought congratulations on doing several 5Ks over this summer.
Jeanne: 
for the many, many things you do, not the least of which is keeping up with all the Ohana Captain-ing!
As for me: Today was a running day for me. I'm trying to accept the fact that I'm slow and enjoy walk breaks, but sometimes have to struggle with the idea that I'm not "really" running. I know other people take walk breaks, or use a RW strategy, but I swear I'm the only person on the paths I see doing a RW. Someone beat some sense into me, okay?
And funny story. I ended up picking up two interlibrary loan books together: Two for the Dough (Evanovich) and Brideshead Revisited (Evelyn Waugh). The librarian looked at the titles and said, "Two very different titles, huh?" And I replied, "Guess which one I'm going to finish first?"
Some white space so those who aren't interested can ignore my ramblings...
Plum fans--Maria, Julie, and Mel: I find it significant you don't see Stephanie as being in the mode of the hard-boiled (HB) detective as you've read the whole series. It suggests the books develop in ways I wouldn't have expected. You're right, I've not read the series and I'm reading into the Plum books within the context of crime fiction. I love, love, love that you don't see it the same way and that you're suggesting the character is going to upset my expectations. Maybe she is the "fluff in a nutter sandwich"--love this phrase, Maria, and will use it whenever possible. The possibility that she doesn't grow fully into her HB potential isn't entirely unexpected, I guess, as the book clearly offers itself as a fun, pulpy take on the genre and Stephanie herself is presented almost comically at times. And I admit, I found it surprising that
One for the Money was been nominated for the Shamus. (Shamus is slang for private detective, btw, and was used to describe Sam Spade in
The Maltese Falcon. There's your trivia for the day.)
Everything in the first novel sets her up to assume the HB detective role--the bounty-hunter occupation, the gritty underworld she lives in (even if NJ is a smaller, more provincial version of LA, NY, Chicago), her straddling the line between law enforcement and the criminal suburb, how many of the book's characters--even good ones--are themselves shady. Very noir-ish, too. I know in
One for the Money she's a novice bounty hunter (detective) by default, and a duck out of water. Still, her actions--carrying a gun, stealing a car, tracking down the bad guys, being threatened--suggest the book is following the HB tropes.
One of the things I found compelling about the first book is its plot was a outsider-becomes-insider narrative. She's becoming the HB loner and we get to see the transformation. I totally could see her following in the HB detective footsteps and imagined the series developing her Stephanie as becoming more and more HB as she enters the underworld more. I even banked on her having to become more and more like Ranger to succeed, then having to embrace her law-abiding Morelli self (and her community) after becoming too much of a loner. So that you say she's not tough implies the series won't follow the trajectory I predicted. Very cool for me.
The romantic relationships in detective fiction. I often think about things, especially in contrast to male HB detectives of the golden era of crime fiction (Hammett, Chandler) and beyond. Romantic, or at least sexual, relationships are a minor part of these books, too. But it seems like romance takes a much more central role in HB-female detective novels. I read it from a feminist perspective. Women trying to juggle their professional and personal identities--and to be a detective means they can claim control over their sexuality but can't maintain a stable romantic relationship. Sometimes they even get involved suspects themselves (which is like Hammett, Chandler, Spillane). Fits very well with the loner aspect of the HB detective, but also with the concerns found in feminist literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. Not a great answer as it's my academic one. As a reader, I find the romantic subplots kind of annoying most of the time unless it's central to the novel.
The family and feminist thing--I can see your qualms with that. I don't think she's feminist like, say, Paretsky. But she's certainly opposed to her Jersey status-quo in her choice of occupation, her self-proclaimed sexuality, and her rejection of the traditional marriage path set out by her mom. It strikes me as important that she is so much closer to Grandma (who would have been a young woman during the 1930s/1940s--feminist heyday--and is clearly unconventional) than her own mother. Of course, that could be typical family dynamics, but Grandma has her own fascination with guns. So I still think she can be read through a feminist lens, if not the Feminism with a capital f.
Too much time on my hands, I know. I'll just shut up now.