Teacup Children

Mickey's Minion

DIS Veteran
Joined
Jul 5, 2009
Messages
1,014
Teacups - Love it.

Although she swings the pendulum way to the other side of child raising, many of her points are very valid.


Author Urges Parents To Quit Hovering


by Tom Henderson Sep 29th 2009 7:00AM

Columnist Lenore Skenazy wrote about allowing her son Izzy to travel on the New York City Subway by himself at the age of 9, and got labeled "America's worst mom." She started the Free-Range Kids movement to silence her objectors.

If "Free-Range Kids" author Lenore Skenazy endangers children -- and some people claim she does -- so does "Sesame Street."

When the first season of that venerable children's show came out on DVD in 2006, it came with a disclaimer that "early 'Sesame Street' episodes are meant for grown-ups and may not meet the needs of today's preschool child."

Why not? Because what used to be considered wholesome fun is now seen as ridiculously reckless. The DVD shows children scampering through large pipes, balancing on planks between picnic tables and generally cavorting through New York City streets.

You'll put an eye out, kid.

The world is just a much more brutal, dangerous place than it was when "Sesame Street" debuted in 1969 -- or so we think.

"The world has changed, but not for the worse," said Skenazy. "It's only our new fear of even very tiny risks that make 'Sesame Street' look like negligence on parade."

She is a champion of what might be called children's liberation -- giving kids longer leashes and, ultimately, less fear-driven lives. In an often fearful society, however, such ideas are sometimes regarded as heresy.

Skenazy found that out when she wrote a column in The New York Sun in 2008 about how she let her 9-year-old son ride the New York City subway system by himself. Within two days, she found herself on NBC's "Today" show, MSNBC and Fox News -- fending off the label of "America's worst mom."

This led to a greater exploration of unchained childhood in her book "Free-Range Kids: Giving Our Children the Freedom We Had Without Going Nuts." She followed up the book with a blog that draws thousands of readers a month and plenty of press from around the globe.

Skenazy's book debunks a number of paranoid myths, the biggest being that society is more dangerous than it was when today's parents were children. The crime rate today is actually lower than it was in the '70s and '80s, the author discovered. And even officials at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children say the threat of "stranger danger" is overblown.

In fact, they say, children should be taught to talk to strangers -- to an extent. Children may need help if they're really in danger and should know how to turn to other people for help.

"It's like we think the neighbors are psychotic pedophiles," Skenazy said. "But there's a network of humanity out there we're sealing our kids off from."

Paranoia runs rampant, she said. Some PTAs now auction off the best drop-off points in front of schools -- spots normally reserved for children with disabilities. "In other words, we'll pay for the privilege of treating our kids like invalids," Skenazy said.

Another story that made the author stop in her tracks was one about a toy recall. One child, she said, who was too young to be playing with the toy anyway, almost choked on a piece of it; hence, the recall. She bristled as she recalled an article in a parenting magazine that suggested moms carry some extra shoelaces when they take their toddlers to other people's homes -- to tie shut the other family's cabinets.

"It's like we're supposed to be baby-proofing the world, when what really keeps kids safe is 'world-proofing' them -- teaching them, for example, what not to touch," she said.

Skenazy admits she's not perfect with her two sons. She can get a little nervous herself. "I'm the arm-waving type," she admitted.

Still, Skenazy said, it's important to remember that while terrible things could happen, it's best to prepare kids for what is likely to happen. "Teach them how to cross the street," she said. What's important, she added, is affording children the dignity of risk.

While some parents find Skenazy's ideas horrifying, others find validation. With the positive reaction to her ideas, "Free-Range Kids" has become more than the title of a book. "It's like what happened in the '60s and '70s with feminism," she said. "Once you have a name, you can have a movement."

Overprotecting children doesn't really keep them safe anyway, Skenazy said. "It keeps them from growing up." College administrators even have a new name for the coddled kids coming to school: Tea cups. Beautiful, beloved children who break all too easily.

The Free-Range founder suggests people think back to their own childhoods.

"You don't remember the times your dad held your handle bars," she said. "You remember the day he let go."
 
Overprotecting children doesn't really keep them safe anyway, Skenazy said. "It keeps them from growing up." College administrators even have a new name for the coddled kids coming to school: Tea cups. Beautiful, beloved children who break all too easily.

The Free-Range founder suggests people think back to their own childhoods.

"You don't remember the times your dad held your handle bars," she said. "You remember the day he let go."
A-men!
 
Nice angle.

However what she fails to point out that "teacup children" existed back in the "old days" too.

Her POV is exactly what she is against. Overblowing a subject.:lmao:
 
I've been a regular reader of her website for a while now. The book definitely helped me worry less.
 

However what she fails to point out that "teacup children" existed back in the "old days" too.
Yes, they existed. But they were fewer and far between. Often teacup children were tormented at school because their parents were so overbearing - it wasn't normal to have the kind of hovering that exists today.

You know what flew into my mind when I read this article? The parents who won't leave their children alone for 30 seconds while they return a grocery cart to it's corral because they fear kidnapping and pedophiles. :rotfl:
 
As a child of the late 70's early 80"s I had a completely different childhood. There were a few teacup children but they stood out and nobody wanted to play with them since they had to stay in front of their house where mommy could see them. Our kids will probably rebel and let their kids run wild.
 
I think it is a great piece:thumbsup2 My favourite part is the bit about remembering the day your dad let go of the handle bars. I also think that while teacup children have always existed, they are now common as opposed to the rare exception. When I was a child I never saw a mother bringing a buy older than preschool age into a public restroom--these days there are 7, 8, 9 even 10 year old boys in tehm all te time with their mothers:rolleyes:Things have absolutely changed in that regard.
 
Yes, they existed. But they were fewer and far between. Often teacup children were tormented at school because their parents were so overbearing - it wasn't normal to have the kind of hovering that exists today.

You know what flew into my mind when I read this article? The parents who won't leave their children alone for 30 seconds while they return a grocery cart to it's corral because they fear kidnapping and pedophiles. :rotfl:
My youngest are 21. When they were younger I would park right at the window of a convenience store and run in to get milk. My car was locked and alarmed and I could see them. They were buckled in. My dd who was three years older was in the car with them. I would not have been considered a bad parent. I was in the store for under 5 minutes and I had twin sons and an older dd. If I brought them in it would have taken me a half hour. Today I could be arrested for such reckless behavior. I have seen threads here where a parent doing this was bashed. The negative side to all of the news is we can hear every horror story. So that one child in ten million who unhooks himself from his car seat puts the car in drive and zooms into traffic after running over and killing an 80 yo woman will be all over the news and we think, I would never do that. If we keep limiting what we do every time we hear of something bad we can tell ourselves we would never do anything that could hurt our children and thererfore nothing can ever harm them and they are 100% safe do to our great parenting.
 
In fact, they say, children should be taught to talk to strangers -- to an extent. Children may need help if they're really in danger and should know how to turn to other people for help.
"

Reminds me of a story I just heard on the news about some boy that was lost in the woods somewhere for several days. Turns out he did hear the searchers calling for him several times but he HID FROM THEM because he was afraid they were going to abduct him. :scared1: He's lucky to be alive all because I guess some parent went way overboard in scaring him to death about the human race.
 
We had teacup children back in my day...the 70's. But they were the exception, not the rule. Today they are the rule. Children today have very few coping mechanisms. They don't need them...their parents handle everything for them.

Prepare your child for the path, not the path for your child.
 
I'm not that old, only 24, but my parents must have fallen into this "free range kids" school of thought. I was left home alone for a few minutes when I was 4, my mom would go the block over to pick my sister up from school, and I would stay in the house. This was also the days before cell phones. I knew not to open the door for anyone, and if someone called, and it wasn't somebody on the "approved" list, I had to tell them that my mom was either in the shower or taking a nap. I started taking the subway by myself in NYC when I was 11. Honestly, I never thought much of it.

Then I got to college, and I met people from more suburban areas, who had never taken the train by themselves, and were terrified every time we took the 30 minute train ride into Manhattan's Penn station. Then again, they thought I was nuts that my parents let me take the subway to school instead of them dropping me off every morning (they worked, not sure when they were supposed to drop me off).
 
Great article!

I see this a lot in college students today.

I've been a sorority rush advisor for about 18 years. I used to be able to be brutally honest with these college "women" when they need to do something to improve themselves, sing a song better, feel more confident, etc....

Now, they are sooooooooo sensitive!!! If you say one thing to them that isn't "You're so great!", they get all waaahhhh!!! If you give them constructive criticism, someone will actually say, "keep it positive". When they get bored or antsy, there is actually one member who will distract them by playing little camp games with them, like frickin' Duck, Duck, Goose!! These are women between the ages of 18-23!!!!

It's like they think they don't have to learn or grow. I love them but, OY, they are frustrating little tea cups! Love the term!!
 
Great article!


Now, they are sooooooooo sensitive!!! If you say one thing to them that isn't "You're so great!", they get all waaahhhh!!! If you give them constructive criticism, someone will actually say, "keep it positive". When they get bored or antsy, there is actually one member who will distract them by playing little camp games with them, like frickin' Duck, Duck, Goose!! These are women between the ages of 18-23!!!!

It's like they think they don't have to learn or grow. I love them but, OY, they are frustrating little tea cups! Love the term!!


I'm reading NurtureShock right now and it has a fascinating chapter on the science that shows why it is really a bad idea to overpraise our kids, or praise them much at all, actually.

It seems to me like maybe the worst cases are the kids in college today, and maybe the pendulum is starting to swing the other way a little now. Maybe? :confused3
 
I'm reading NurtureShock right now and it has a fascinating chapter on the science that shows why it is really a bad idea to overpraise our kids, or praise them much at all, actually.

It seems to me like maybe the worst cases are the kids in college today, and maybe the pendulum is starting to swing the other way a little now. Maybe? :confused3

I really hope it is swinging back not to another extreme. We need balance.

Kids need to be recognized for their accomplishments. But they need to know when they screw up too. When sports and schools went to giving trophies and awards to EVERYONE, things started to get really skewed. Kids lost the opportunity to learn how to be gracious "losers" and to work for something they really want. In life, you win some, you lose some. In general, kids aren't being taught that anymore.

They are being set up for perpetual disappointment and frustration when they grow up and learn that the world is not going to pat them on the back for merely doing the basics and what is expected of them.
 
Great article!

I see this a lot in college students today.

I've been a sorority rush advisor for about 18 years. I used to be able to be brutally honest with these college "women" when they need to do something to improve themselves, sing a song better, feel more confident, etc....

Now, they are sooooooooo sensitive!!! If you say one thing to them that isn't "You're so great!", they get all waaahhhh!!! If you give them constructive criticism, someone will actually say, "keep it positive". When they get bored or antsy, there is actually one member who will distract them by playing little camp games with them, like frickin' Duck, Duck, Goose!! These are women between the ages of 18-23!!!!

It's like they think they don't have to learn or grow. I love them but, OY, they are frustrating little tea cups! Love the term!!

That is so true! I just enrolled my Dd in theater classes that help to break these tea cups (my child definitely has tea cup potential;)) I gave her the heads up (because DH and I both attended this theater) - THEY WILL NOT BABY YOU! They will not tell you that everything that you do is WONDERFUL!! They're gonna keep it real and it will be good for you!

I can surely tell which one of my patients are tea cups!
 
My DS20 went all through grammar school with kids from a family with 4 kids who would not let them ride a school bus - ever. If there was a class trip, a parent drove. If there was an away game for a sport, the child involved could not ride the bus with the rest of the team - a parent drove. None of us ever knew why they had that rule

Another term used by professors for college kids is "snowflakes", because each has been told all their life that they are unique and special.
 
That is so true! I just enrolled my Dd in theater classes that help to break these tea cups (my child definitely has tea cup potential;)) I gave her the heads up (because DH and I both attended this theater) - THEY WILL NOT BABY YOU! They will not tell you that everything that you do is WONDERFUL!! They're gonna keep it real and it will be good for you!

The barn DD rides at is like this. The instructers are very hard on them (for the safety of the rider, and the well-being of the horses). When she was new, it was difficult for me to watch. She loves it though. She has told me she always knows what she is doing wrong, and what she is excelling at.
 
Her POV is exactly what she is against. Overblowing a subject.:lmao:
Overblowing a subjet -- exactly. She's taken an idea that's basically sound (don't baby your child too much), and she's taken it to an extreme, making it into a bad idea.

Going too far in either direction is a bad thing. I do personally know two young ladies who've been in the right place at the right time, doing the right thing . . . and they've been raped. And that's not counting date rape situations. I know plenty of kids who've gotten into various kinds of trouble because they weren't adequately supervised. Maybe teachers just hear these stories more often than other people do, but free-range is a stupid idea for children. Giving too much freedom too soon is just asking for trouble.

On the other hand, we do all know kids who've never had the chance to develop independence. I do know teenagers who've literally never been anywhere without a parent or a trusted adult friend; they don't tend to be happy children. I don't know which is worse -- too much or too little freedom -- but neither extreme is beneficial to the child.
It's possible to raise kids that aren't teacups OR tormentors.
And that's the goal for which we should be aiming.
Now, they are sooooooooo sensitive!!! If you say one thing to them that isn't "You're so great!", they get all waaahhhh!!! If you give them constructive criticism, someone will actually say, "keep it positive". When they get bored or antsy, there is actually one member who will distract them by playing little camp games with them, like frickin' Duck, Duck, Goose!! These are women between the ages of 18-23!!!!
I see LOTS of this in high school today. If your response isn't, "Oh, wow, that's absolutely the best I've ever seen. You could do that professionally! You are fantastic!", then they view it as criticism. They don't even register the lack of sincerity when the very same thing is said to someone else two minutes later.

Another teacher -- one who's mid-20s said something to me in jest the other day, and it hit home with me. She'd done something very minor wrong (it was something along the lines of turning in a wrong form), and she was mildly reprimanded. She said that it struck her as UNFAIR. She said that it struck her that she WASN"T SUPPOSED TO LOSE. No one loses. At least no one good, and she's definitely good. She realized that she was being silly, and she said this completely in jest, but it was also true. We went on to talk about how her generation has never really been told they're wrong or they've lost in anything, so when the real world hits and they DO lose at something, it hits them like a ton of bricks.

However, back to your comment, I see this as two separate parenting issues:
1) parents who are overly protective
and 2) parents who praise too much.

Yes, parents who do these things probably do them both, but I see it as two separate mistakes.
 














Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top