Originally Posted by HsvTeacher
My comments are in blue:
Hardly a fair comparison...Perfectly fair. She has an issue with whom she serves. It certainly is something to consider when one chooses their profession. Unless there are teachers who NEVER have to deal with parents. It is something to consider, but many parents are becoming harder to deal with as the years pass. I have 16 years as a teacher to back up this claim, 19 if you want to count up the years I was an aide. (And my students and their educations are my priority, not making parents love me.) Some time ago, pre-children...I had considered going into teaching by pursuing the Master's program (I think--one where you already have a Bachelor's but want to go into education). Anyway, I had met someone who was a 4th grade teacher. She ended up leaving the profession and becoming a flight attendant and many of her comments made it clear that it probably wasn't a good career choice for me.
I'm sure she gives a lot of parents the "benefit of the doubt,"Really? Has she spoken with the kids or the parents to see how they might treat their pets? as you told me you give teachers the benefit of the doubt (most of the time) in another thread.Sure--I also don't go around saying MOST TEACHERS I KNOW....and then say something bad. Blanket statements like that are nothing more than hyperbole. And parents here on the DIS don't make broad, sweeping generalizations about teachers? On the other hand, how do you know the OP doesn't work in a bad area? I didn't dispute that--I would say "unless"...and I am sure if that was important, she would have mentioned it. She wants to parent bash and nothing more.When I first started teaching, I worked in one of the worst schools in the city, and no, I wouldn't have wanted those parents to watch my dogs, either.I have had friends who have taught in such areas. They didn't parent bash. They had compassion for the children and understood that some areas are just rough. But you wouldn't ever hear them say "I wouldn't trust them to watch a dog..." Well, let's see, I've had parents that couldn't be bothered to take care of their kids because they were either too stoned, strung out, or drunk. No, I wouldn't want those people around anything I loved. Did I treat my students with anything other than love and understanding? Absolutely not! It's not their fault that their parents are idiots.Fair enough. But do you characterize all parents as potential drunks/druggies? That was my point.
If I recall correctly, you homeschool, right? What if every teacher on the DIS started bashing homeschooling parents by starting threads on pretty much a daily basis? After awhile, would it wear you down?Nope. Because I would know that statistics doesn't back up their ignorance if they chose to generalize in that manner. I also don't play homeschooling martyr and get irritated with those who do.
I usually either skip the teacher threads, however, today has been one of those days when I did have to deal with an irrational parent. That is fine--I never said that people don't have moments where they encounter irrational people. It is when you use that irrational moment to characterize an entire group that would make one wonder why (general) you remains in a profession that causes such grief. I remain in teaching because I love what I do: teaching kids. I just don't like dealing with irrational parents. He decided that because my principal made a safety-related decision regarding a field trip that he had the right to call our secretary and me every name in the book. He was nasty and belligerent, but because he was a parent, he got a pass on his behavior. If I had acted as he did, I would have been fired.I know that folks don't like education to be termed like a business, but this is one of those "customer is always right" moments. They may be totally in the wrong. As the professional, your boss holds you to a higher standard. In retail, I would not be permitted either. However, if the behavior was abusive, we could at least kick them out of the store. I'm, not sure why he gets a "pass" though. Do you mean that he gets a "pass" because you can't rebut, or he gets a "pass" because the school lets him dish while you must take it until he is finished dishing? I consider my business to be educating students. However, I don't always believe the customer is always right. I can't tell you how many times I've had to listen to a parent berate me, humiliate me, etc. only for them to come back later and tell me that I was completely right and knew what I was doing. It doesn't make it hurt any less, though. And no, parents don't get kicked out for being abusive toward teachers. They have to threaten to hurt us or kills us before anything is done. (We don't want to upset our stakeholders.) We're expecting to stand there and take it, which I did today. That is what I meant by his getting a pass. Neither do I--but I was referring to what your superiors expect. Sucks if they can be verbally abusive and you just have to listen to it. I would not have the patience for that. Are you working in a private school. (stakeholders?)
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. As far as I know, you've never been in my profession so I don't know why I should expect you to understand my point of view and thoughts on the matter.No, but to an extent, I am in the population which your POV is talking about. Teachers/teacher supporters get bothered when parents are upset by something. They assume--at least on the "teacher" threads on the DIS that the poster is automatically being irrational because they are a parent and blah blah blah. You will get a few teachers that acknowledge that the OP might have the case. Regardless, a rebuttal parent bashing thread pops up.