ofcabbagesandkings
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Messages
- 2,306
I never said, we should make no effort, I said closing things is the WRONG effort. There are many other choices that could have been made from reducing capacity to increasing cleaning to closing certain high risk attractions, for example the Finding Nemo Subs probably would have need to be closed if the parks had remained open.
Also, The reality is the vast majority of people who get sick won't need to be hospitalized and closing everything for a few weeks isn't going to reduce anything, just increase homelessness and disease in the long run and MORE people will die and be hospitalized over the long run than if we let this run its course. Yes, it will be different people, in this case we have younger, healthier people not needing to be hospitalized, getting sick and dying. We will also be seeing increased suicide rates. There are no perfect answers, but what they came up with is definitely the wrong one.
Do you have even a single dataset or study you can point to in order to back up this wildly wrong speculation? Because I can point to a whole lot about how social distancing and flattening the curve so that hospitals aren't overwhelmed all at once saves more lives than just letting people gather in large groups like normal, to watch parades, etc. Just compare the results of the 1918 flu epidemic in Philadelphia, which held its St. Paddy's parade, to St. Louis, which didn't. (Hint: A LOT more people died in Philly)
It sucks that Disney had to do this for public health and safety. I was really looking forward to my cruise in October, and it will probably be canceled. But other people's lives, (yes, even old people's lives) matter more than my vacation.