JimmyV
Por favor manténganse alejado de las puertas.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2008
- Messages
- 8,060
You missed my point. "Spending" does not equal profit. The family paying a very low rate at the Value Resort may not be bringing in any actual profit with their hotel fee. Tickets, food, etc. Yes. But Disney is probably barely breaking even when it rents a room for $80.Domestic Per Room Guest Spending was $267 last year. This number was skewed upward a bit by DLR's 3 hotels but with WDW having about 90% of domestic hotels, the number closely matches spending at WDW, probably within about $10.
So, on average, how much more was a family staying onsite spending than a family staying offsite?
At least $257 per day more.
I guess we run in different circles. Most of the people that I know who stay off site do so because their families are too large to stay in Disney hotels, or they travel in large groups such that condos are more appealing. They can more than afford the Grand Floridian. At least, one room there. But they aren't going to pay for two separate rooms at a Deluxe or Moderate when they can get a 3 bedroom condo for much less. And Swan, Dolphin, Bonnet Creek and soon, the Four Seasons are "off site". You cannot convince me that the Westin and Waldorf Astoria families can afford to spend less than the All Star families.Then there's the "family income" thing. A family able to afford a WDW hotel, even a WDW Value Resort, is more likely able to spend more than the average family staying offsite. (Sorry but even WDW's Value Resorts are pretty expensive, more expensive than a lot of really night offsite hotels.)
Add it all together and the typical onsite family is spending a lot more than the typical offsite family.



