kaytieeldr
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2005
- Messages
- 51,313
I'm not a big fan of the automatic off-handed dismissal of any statistic by saying "There are lies, damn lies, and statistics" or "You can make stats prove anything you want", etc. Instead I think a better expression is "You can make a set of data confess to whatever you want it to... if you torture it enough!" This at least obligates the naysayer to explain how the numbers are being abused.
They explained why they they selected non-dome teams for their analysis... It's recognized that controlled indoor environments (no snow, no rain, no cold) make for fewer fumbles. It's an attempt to compare like-for-like... not exactly applying the thumbscrews in my book! And yes, the Pats run more plays, they pointed that out, which adds more interest that even with a heck of a lot more plays, they didn't cough up a ball at home this season.
But you're right, it might just be "nothing" or a mere coincidence... or it might be like back in the 90's when people noticed that some MLB players were hitting balls a heck of a lot further more often than other guys!![]()
Yup. There's a graph on my FaceBook feed showing the correlation between autism and organic food usage. Completely invalid, but a perfect example of the bolded.