That was the specific point of my last paragraph. Either annual pass discounts (resident or
DVC) can be given at a CM's discretion without any documentation (which would lead to issues with any type of discount), or proof of eligibility for the discount is required. In the case of DVC, it is the latter. A card (either digital or physical) must be presented.
As I said originally, in Anaheim, residency is determined and verified in the system via zip code. The CM's can't make a "mistake", or be "poorly trained". I used residency as an example, only because for California ticketing it's a number typed into the computer and that's it. Just like a membership number. There is zero reason why a ticketing CM can't be required to physically enter the membership number into the system and leave it to the system to determine eligibility. The systems are already linked.
My point in referencing the Florida resident discount was simply to point out that poor TRAINING would logically not be selective. If CM's were not following proper training protocol in verifying one type of discount, however that discount is determined, then it would follow that they would be similarly poorly trained in other types of discounts (what they do or don't need to see, who is eligible and why, etc.), and I am curious as to whether there are reports of screw ups in issuing Florida resident discounts as well. From a training perspective.
I'm just not buying the "its new/badly trained CM's behind it all" argument.