
willis37862 said:He said that it had been rated PG13 but that people who had viewed it wanted them to add more to it and make it R rated. I don't know why. PG13 is bad enough most of the time.
georgina said:Or can you point me to a good site to find out more about the content of movies?
Yep, saw him in an interview this morning and that's what SLJ said.Tiggeroo said:i heard it became r because SLJ wanted to add one F-bomb in a scene he felt fit it.

Well, if that's the case, she could probably see it, because she hears that from me on occasion.Tiggeroo said:i heard it became r because SLJ wanted to add one F-bomb in a scene he felt fit it.
I don't think I have ever seen a Samuel L Jackson movie, so it would not make it obvious to me.cardaway said:Samuel L Jackson is in it. Makes it kind of obvious doesn't it?![]()
georgina said:DD, 16, has been waiting all summer for this movie to be released, and now it is apparently rated R. Does anyone know what for (sex, violence, language?) Or can you point me to a good site to find out more about the content of movies?
dementia412 said:Well there are alot of BAD horror movies, believe a woman who has sat through Leach Woman, Stuff and Overdrawn at the Memory Bank. They said Snakes was suposed to be a little cheesy, but by the time the got done it had become fully cheeserific. I love Jackson so I'll see it no matter how bad it is, but I doubt I'll waste precious theater time on it since I don't get to go much.
I personally never care what a movie is rated, ratings seem so arbitrary. I am planning on watching "This Film Is Not Yet Rated" though.