mmackeymouse
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,855
Yes really. BC (before covid) people went ahead and booked cruises without any thought what so ever about how many others would be on board. The assumption was always that the ship would be full. Or nearly so.
Even now you have no control over how full the ship is. You just want to sail on this particular ship/itinerary/sailing. So you go ahead and book it.
We have 4 cruises booked over the next year. Never even considered what the capacity levels would be on those sailings.
![]()
Well, it's kind of futile to mention BC in regards to this conversation, because it's not BC.
Sure, the assumption was always that the ship would be full. But, the assumption was also that everything would be functioning as normal. To expect a ship to sail full...or even at 70% with 30-40% functionality....that's a recipe for disaster.
As it is, we are not BC....we are on the (hopefully) tail end of a global pandemic. So, the assumption, isn't that the ship will be full, but rather that the ship will be limited to the point that safety and distancing are the #1 priority. And, it's not just an assumption....it's what they are telling us. They are actively saying, "reduced capacity." It's a vague term. It's one of those things that non-commitally straddles the fence. But, surely, they are aware that in the midst of a global pandemic...surely they know what people want/need from "reduced capacity."