LindsayDunn228
<font color=teal>Quite a hunk of man, isn't he???<
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2004
- Messages
- 10,787
OP, your link doesn't work.
There is nothing that a person that may have read a few books or articles on communism/socialism can say that will change my point of view and experiences. I lived it for almost 15 years. My knowledge and facts are based on what I lived and experienced, not what I heard or read somewhere.
You don't have to look much further that the oil for food scandal to have a reason to critize the UN.BunsenH said:toto2,
I admire the way you state your opinion and explain its basis. Your arguments are in sharp contrast with the name callers (Chavez seems to be one also!) and UN bashers who don't address the substance of the issue at hand.
Fitswimmer said:Thank you for posting and I'm glad that you are living here now away from all that.
Sometimes I stop and think, "This is really my life?" Yes, our hard work and determination made it possible, but the opportunity is there for anyone that wants to take it. In Cuba, the same work ethic and desire to get ahead would have gotten us nowhere.The US, press included, should leave this little Castro-wannabe alone. News stories I've read have indicated that his social and economic policies are starting to run into the problems that many predicted would happen when he took power. The biggest problem he faces is the fall-out of this populist seizing of forgien oil assets and open hostility to those international oil companies that remain. That hostility has included increasing royalty payments for oil to 30%, demanding billions of dollars in "back taxes", and requiring the state owned oil company be made a majority partner in oil ventures.Her take on things is that Chavez scares the heck out of his people because he is so unstable.
Tanuki said:The U.S already sponsored a coup against Chavez which didn't take. Mobs of people stormed the Presidential Palace and threw the new guy out of it.
By the end of a weekend Chavez was back in power.
Personally, when I heard about the speech I thought "he still has a bug up his butt about that time Bush tried to overthrow him".
Galahad said:Ah yes, those stupid, stupid Americans........
toto2 said:The united Arab emirat, Saudi Arabia just to name two are "friends " of the USA.
kirbsam said:sounds like he is doing for his country what a fella by the name of hitler, did for his. if i recall, he was also elected in his own right. sounds like what a fella by the name of hussein did for iraq. schools, hospitals...must have been good men.
I don't doubt that Fidel Jr. thinks the coup was sponsored by the US, but I don't think there's much (if any) that the US did any such thing. "Supported", yes... "Indicate in advance to the coup plotters that we'd recognize a new government after a coup", yes. "Sponsor", no. "Sponsor" means we provided funds, material, logistics, and made the whole thing happen. Without a doubt the US administration wished to be Chavez go at the time, but we weren't the "trigger man" for the failed coup.The U.S already sponsored a coup against Chavez which didn't take.
Yep, ask Bush about that syndrome!!!It amazes me that , as soon as someone proposes somethin different , he is compared to Hitler ,
I have a real problem with such arguements. The fact is, unless you can point to actual examples of actions and reactions, such "everybody knows that..." arguments are easy to make and require zero proof. It's speculation. And speculation can be made about anything you want. Until the King of Saudi Arabia makes such statements as Chavez and takes such actions, no one can say with any certainty what the US reaction will be. Such pronouncements are only opinion. Diplomacy is a multi-varient system. As such you can't automatically take one scenario and assume that it will apply to another. During WWII we were allied pretty tightly with Josef Stalin... another unsavory character. At that time, under the set of circumstances present, that was the best move for the US and Great Britian. That relationship then disolved when a new set of circumstances were realized.Since Venezuela has petrol , you can be sure that rich countries will keep an eye on Chavez. The only problem with this potential dictator is that he is not on the American side. If he would be in Saudi Arabia , you can be sure that the US would not have a problem with him.
Acutally, the US has been one of the few countries that put a lot of effort into trying to keep the situation in Darfur in the World's spotlight.There is a genocide going on in Darfur right now, and what are our respective governements doing ? Nothing !
I agree. He is such an idiot that I hate to feed his delusion of grandeur by responding. I think it hurts him. He will retain some influence due to those oil reserves, but many in Latin American that warmed to him initially are now realizing what they are dealing withGalahad said:Do cartoon characters need to apologize?
We did. Otto Reich at State recognized the new government before it was possible to do so without advance. It was actually an Opus Dei plot, which makes me sound tin foil hat, but it's trueGeoff_M said:I don't doubt that Fidel Jr. thinks the coup was sponsored by the US, but I don't think there's much (if any) that the US did any such thing. "Supported", yes... "Indicate in advance to the coup plotters that we'd recognize a new government after a coup", yes. "Sponsor", no. "Sponsor" means we provided funds, material, logistics, and made the whole thing happen. Without a doubt the US administration wished to be Chavez go at the time, but we weren't the "trigger man" for the failed coup.
Geoff_M said:I don't doubt that Fidel Jr. thinks the coup was sponsored by the US, but I don't think there's much (if any) that the US did any such thing. "Supported", yes... "Indicate in advance to the coup plotters that we'd recognize a new government after a coup", yes. "Sponsor", no. "Sponsor" means we provided funds, material, logistics, and made the whole thing happen. Without a doubt the US administration wished to be Chavez go at the time, but we weren't the "trigger man" for the failed coup.


sodaseller said:We did. Otto Reich at State recognized the new government before it was possible to do so without advance. It was actually an Opus Dei plot, which makes me sound tin foil hat, but it's true