I'm so glad you enjoyed 1900 Park Fare--we are looking forward to that!
I have never even heard of 4GB cards, I thought that 2 was the most you could get. I have just gotten a digital SLR (Nikon D40) but I am used to using a Nikon Coolpix digital. What is the difference in taking RAW photos versus the 'large' setting (which is what I am using). Are the pictures better in RAW? I'm still learning!
I have been using RAW format since I purchased my first DSLR maybe 5 years ago. In a nutshell, RAW is the image as the camera's sensor captures it. It is uncompressed and unprocessed. I prefer it as to me it gives me the best picture, in the end, that my camera is capable of taking. The one drawback, if you consider it that, is that each photo must be processed, or at least run through a RAW converter of some sort. This is not really as big a deal as it sounds, as most new OS's can at least view the files, and most popular photo programs can view and manipulate them.
Lastly, they allow for a much better chance of fixing an "oops" as far as over or under exposure is concerned. I have been able to correct blown highlights, and severly underexposed pics by shooting in RAW that I could have never saved using JPG. If you want to do a bit more reading to learn about it, there are a ton of resources on the web. Here's a short, but informative link, from Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAW_image_format
In the end, I guess it's personal preferences, or obessesion with at least trying to get the most out of your photo's, LOL. For me, I'm just a lot happier with the end result. The only drawback, and it's not a biggie for me, is file size. My 30D RAW file size is roughly 8-9MB vs say 4-5 for JGP. That's nearly twice the drive space, but heck, storage is cheap today!
