This is probably not going to be a popular post, but IMO this is one of the more ridiculous threads I've read in awhile, on so many levels. (Not so much the original post as the general reaction to it.)
First, you can't draw a straight line from ticket prices to profitability. Not with the information most of us have, anyway. Both operating costs and price/profit maximization models in China are likely to be different from that of US parks.
Second, Disney is not a taxpayer-funded organization. As a consumer, you certainly have a right to consider their business practices when you decide whether or not to patronize the company. But understand that domestic ticket prices have little or nothing to do with what is or is not happening in Shanghai. They will charge whatever the domestic market will support, and whether domestic profits are used to re-invest in the business, line shareholder or executive pockets, or employed as very expensive toilet paper is really not very relevant to what people are willing to pay.
Third (and yes, I'm restating here), Disney is not a taxpayer-funded organization. It's a business. And as a business, their only reason for existence is to make money. In other words, you can rest assured that if they chose to build a park in Shanghai, it's because whoever gets to make the decisions believes that they will make money at it. Maybe not immediately, and maybe not even directly, but in one way or another, they believe it will eventually produce a net profit. Everyone is welcome to form his own opinion regarding their chances of success, but you can be sure that funnelling profits from the domestic parks into a losing venture in China is NOT part of their long-term strategy.
And last - is one kid peeing in the bushes really that big of a deal? I'm willing to accept that public urination, and maybe even defecation, is a problem in China as a whole, although I've never read up on it myself. But it's a bit of a leap from one picture of a pre-school aged child peeing in the bushes to "the Chinese are going to wreck the place by relieving themselves everywhere, indiscriminately". I have to say, if I had a small child who really had to pee, and there was no bathroom reachable, I'd let him go in the bushes. Yup, even in the city. I'd do my best to find an out-of-the way place, but if the alternative is letting him pee in his pants... yeah, the bushes seem preferable to that.