Pink Partridge
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2016
- Messages
- 1,614
There are some people that love to fabricate racism. Such an injustice towards those that experience it for real.That is asinine. She admitted to having a banned substance in her system.
There are some people that love to fabricate racism. Such an injustice towards those that experience it for real.That is asinine. She admitted to having a banned substance in her system.
https://www.axios.com/shacarri-rich...ana-80280796-020d-4be4-befc-b4b04c0cf60c.htmlShe was not selected for the relay team so she will miss the Tokyo Olympics.
I think the concern was less about performance enhancing and more about the health risks. THC can cause delayed reactions, adverse mental health effects, even psychosis. Its a mind-altering substance that can stay within your system for a lot longer than caffeine or alcohol.It is not a performance enhancing drug
But the fact remains that alcohol & caffeine have those same affects and they don’t ban them. The length of time argument is a red herring, since there is nothing stopping somebody from showing up hung over the morning of their race. So my point remains - the hypocrisy of the rule is the problem.I think the concern was less about performance enhancing and more about the health risks. THC can cause delayed reactions, adverse mental health effects, even psychosis. Its a mind-altering substance that can stay within your system for a lot longer than caffeine or alcohol.
The bottom line is that if she wants to compete in the Olympics, she has to abide by their rules. If they said all athletes have to wear polka-dots and eat hot dogs, then that's what they have to do if they want to be part of it. I was glad to see she at least acknowledged that and owned the mistake. She's fortunate that she's young and seemingly will have a successful career going forward.
I think most would agree that the rule has room for revisions, especially given the fact that marijuana is being legalized now. But no matter what rules are in place, its incumbent upon the athletes who want to participate to understand the rules and abide by them, no matter how antiquated or ridiculous they are.But the fact remains that alcohol & caffeine have those same affects and they don’t ban them. The length of time argument is a red herring, since there is nothing stopping somebody from showing up hung over the morning of their race. So my point remains - the hypocrisy of the rule is the problem.
Never said any differently.I think most would agree that the rule has room for revisions, especially given the fact that marijuana is being legalized now. But no matter what rules are in place, its incumbent upon the athletes who want to participate to understand the rules and abide by them, no matter how antiquated or ridiculous they are.
Never said you didNever said any differently.

I wouldn't take the risk of running her and getting a whole relay DQ'd.I am very disappointed that she wasn't selected for the relay. My guess is that they selected English Gardner and Aleia Hobbs to cover their butts in case they need to fill a race before Sha'Carri's suspension is up.
No. She would not in fact be punished again for the same incident. She is in fact ineligible for the individual 100 but eligible by the time she would run the relay. However, the fear is what if she uses again? That's the risk I was referring to. I'd want to see more than a month clean before I'd run her in a relay is what I was saying.I don't understand the Olympic rules enough to know if the IOC would accept the US's suspension or not. The relay was after the end of the suspension. Or is she would still test positive for trace amounts of THC at the games and they could DQ the the relay even though she had already been tested and punished for it.
I don't understand the Olympic rules enough to know if the IOC would accept the US's suspension or not. The relay was after the end of the suspension. Or is she would still test positive for trace amounts of THC at the games and they could DQ the the relay even though she had already been tested and punished for it.I wouldn't take the risk of running her and getting a whole relay DQ'd.
As much as I am pro marijuana and live in a legal state, I respect her suspension. It is not about legality or what pot is or isn't.. But the list of banned substances is huge and there are legal drugs that are regulated. At the end of the day she knew the rules and chose to take the risk and smoke anyways. With that judgement... I can understand that there be some worry that she might end up using again and that could DQ the relayI don't understand the Olympic rules enough to know if the IOC would accept the US's suspension or not. The relay was after the end of the suspension. Or is she would still test positive for trace amounts of THC at the games and they could DQ the the relay even though she had already been tested and punished for it.
I don't understand the Olympic rules enough to know if the IOC would accept the US's suspension or not. The relay was after the end of the suspension. Or is she would still test positive for trace amounts of THC at the games and they could DQ the the relay even though she had already been tested and punished for it.
As I understand it, they had two spots open for athletes that didn't qualify in an event ("pool selections"). Those spots were filled with the 6th and 7th finishers in the 100m dash instead of Sha'Carri. The USATF did say that because she DQ'd trials it wouldn't be fair to give her a place on the relay. I can respect that, but I am still disappointed.She tested positive at the trials during a mandatory post-race drug test. The positive test nullified her win as she was DQed because of the positive drug test. Because of the DQ, she didn't win the race and she didn't qualify.