chirurgeon said:It was voted down because the REPUBLICANS tacked on an amendment to do away with the Federal Estate tax. If the bill had been just the minimum wage increase it would have passed. I believe the Republican poison pill killed the legislation.
chirurgeon said:It was voted down because the REPUBLICANS tacked on an amendment to do away with the Federal Estate tax. If the bill had been just the minimum wage increase it would have passed. I believe the Republican poison pill killed the legislation.
chirurgeon said:The deficit is large enough and the rich can afford to pay the tax.
Because the Democrats have an ounce of fiscal responsibility. They understand that the massive proposed tax cut would lead to massive borrowing, even more debt, even more interest that all of us would have to pay.Charade said:So, like I said, the Dems were more interested in the government taking money from the rich than allowing the working poor to get an increase in pay.
Let's start with Dubya.Charade said:Really?
Maybe instead of penalizing someone for being successful, we should be holding our elected officials accountable with the money they already take from us.
Give them more and they'll spend more.
Charade said:Really?
Maybe instead of penalizing someone for being successful, we should be holding our elected officials accountable with the money they already take from us.
Give them more and they'll spend more.

The amendment did not do away with the estate tax. It would have amended the amount on which taxes would have been exempt, from the current 2 million in 2006 to a cap of 5 million by 2015. As it stands now, the tax will rise until 2009, then in 2010 there will be NO estate tax, and beginning in 2011, the rate will revert back to pre-2006?(not sure about this year) rates.chirurgeon said:It was voted down because the REPUBLICANS tacked on an amendment to do away with the Federal Estate tax. If the bill had been just the minimum wage increase it would have passed. I believe the Republican poison pill killed the legislation.
kydisneyfans said:No big deal-the media will play on this and make the Republicans look even worse since they tacked on the junk estate tax decrease.
It will pass in 07 when the Dems take Congress this fall. The Republicans should have left the bill as it was intended as they infuriated the millions of voters who would have gained income with this bill. I also like Hillary's idea of tying the minimum wage to Congressional raises or cost of living.
Remember-tens of millions of poor voters have more power than the few thousand this estate reduction would have benefitted.
Charade said:So what you're saying is the minimum wage earners would be (are?) more upset with Republicans for trying to cut the taxes of the rich than the Dems voting down a bill that would help them?
Sounds like both the Dems and the minimum wage earners got their priorities out of whack if that's true.
eclectics said:I don't know how many times someone has to say it before you get it! If the Republicans had left the bill alone, it would have passed. Your trying to spin this so the Dems come out as the villians is interesting, but par for the course. It's that kind of nonsense that is finally going to loose the Repubs the House this year.
Charade said:If the two bills were separate, the Estate tax bill wouldn't have passed.
eclectics said:Boo hoo. And who's fault is it for lumping them together? The minimum wage would have passed. So now, you say, no one gets anything. That's exactly right! Blame your own party.
Charade said:I knew that was coming.
Apparently they are more concerned with the "rich" keeping more of their money than low income earners making more money.
![]()