School administrator has a restraining order?

[Anewman]

IMHO, some people are just very good liars.

I agree 100%... But unlike you I assume that it goes on both sides of restraining orders.

 

[WebmasterAlex]

It is very easy to get a restraining order against a person, and they are very common ploys in divorces especially when custody is an issue.

I have a buddy going through a separation...

Out of the Blue she moves out and gets a restraining order.
She calls him to meet for lunch at her job, which he later gets arrested for violating the restraining order.
She calls him asking if they can work things out and SHE MOVES BACK home, he calls her at work and gets arrested for violating that restraining order again. BUT SHE IS LIVING AT HIS HOUSE.

http://orangecountyda.com/home/index.asp?page=8&recordid=1101

That ranks up there with the STUPIDEST things I have ever seen, she moves back in but he gets arrested for calling her cell phone?

 

[S. C.]

Also, these orders are not handed out like candy, as some men would like people to think. To get an order both parties must meet with a judge to prove why it is warranted and the person it is ordered against is allowed to face the accuser. Proof or a witnesses is usually needed

Not where I live. No witness is needed and the orders are given out like candy. It is up to the person accused to prove it wrong and get it dropped after they are served.

BTW: I am a woman not a man.

I do not believe they are easy to get anywhere. I tend to think that people who claim they are easy are just trying to diminish the validity of the victim because they are friends of, related to, or involved with abusive men. Its much more comfortable for people to blame the victim than admit they might have misjudged someone. IMHO, some people are just very good liars.

I have no need to lie!

One thing I agree with ... it is JUST... IN YOUR OPINON!.

 

[ameraumi]

I do not believe they are easy to get anywhere. I tend to think that people who claim they are easy are just trying to diminish the validity of the victim because they are friends of, related to, or involved with abusive men. Its much more comfortable for people to blame the victim than admit they might have misjudged someone. IMHO, some people are just very good liars.

I had no problem getting one from my ex. We were never married, but he is the bio-father of my DS. After we split up it was a case of "I don't want you but no one else can have you either". He followed me non-stop, knew my every move, made threats, ect. My attorney who was handling the paternity & support case filed it for me and I was granted it without going to court.

 

[Imzadi]

I have no need to lie!

One thing I agree with ... it is JUST... IN YOUR OPINON!.

Whoa, S.C., I don't think LuvOrlando was meaning you were lying. I took it to mean the two parties in question. Domestic violence cases are often extremely multi-layered & complicated. It's hard to know who is telling the truth. Often, the truth is not as straightforward and apparent as it should be.

If we take the situation I explained above of my own ex-BFF: From a judge's point of view, listening to this dance they do, it may seem like my ex-BFF is the one lying, because her actions clearly are contradictory to a woman who needs an order of protection. And women like her, who do leave & continually come back, make it harder for women who are in real imminent danger, who do have an intent to really leave, to get one. When these same judges see over and over, that the women who they previously gave a restraining order to, constantly go back home, it's hard to make clear judgement calls about others.