I wouldn't seriously suggest it if I didn't do some math on ROI. Disney weddings, even simple ones with short hours and not a lot of food/alcohol purchased, are not cheap. I researched them as a wedding venue option over a decade ago and it was tens of thousands of dollars just for the least expensive venue back then, before high inflation. That venue price does not include the minimum food/alcohol per person price ($100-$250 per person with a 50 person minimum). Even at the very conservative $19,000 per wedding during the slow wedding season ($14,000 venue + $5,000 food/bev minimum), they could have 1-2 (maybe 3) per day if they are shorter in length. Renting it longer would cost more. Let's say 2 weddings/events earning $38,000 per day. Factor in for 15% of the year it's not rented as a venue at all. $38,000 per day x 365 days per year = $13,870,000 , minus 15% no event occupancy ($2,080,500)= $11,789,500 before operating costs. That's on the low end becuase these events could easily go for $30,000+ each. Even if you chop that conservative $11.78M in half for operating costs that leaves $5.89M revenue. If you spent $20M on upgrading it to be in the lake, that means you'd see a return within 3 years when calculating conservatively. The first few years you'd have high demand because it's a new venue that's historic that couples would be all for. So Disney could likely charge more, which means they could get the $20M back in 1-2 years instead of 3-5. Once that initial investment is paid off, it's now a money making machine, even with maintenance/refurb and operating costs.