camaker
Anything worth doing is worth overdoing
- Joined
- May 8, 2015
- Messages
- 5,006
The biggest reason to have more than 1 or 2 pair of running shoes is the constant change. Even if you stick with the same model (example - Nike Pegasus), every year they come out with a new version of the shoe. The new version is often structurally unlike previous versions. Every time a new version comes out, you have to go through the entire shoe choice regimen again. This mans trial and error, with some of the errors possibly producing running injuries.
I buy shoes once/year to avoid this, and I buy them between training seasons in case a new shoe type causes me issues. I buy one pair, try it out for a few weeks, then buy 4 more pair to get me through the entire running year once I know that the shoes will work for me. It minimizes my injury risks throughout the season.
Now, my wife thinks that this is boring because all of my running shoes look exactly the same. I number each pair with permanent markers so I can track their mileage, but she is right - they look the same. Thing is, I don't care. I'd rather have boring shoes than have to deal with injuries.
One of the things that I do to mitigate the potential for change bringing injury is to buy past models. Once I know that a model works for me, rather than buy the new model that comes out, I go bargain surfing for the superseded model on sites like ebay and 6pm.com. Not only does that ensure continuity of model for the shoes for another year or two (you can usually find a couple of model years back), it typically saves a significant amount of money. I typically run in Brooks Glycerin, which are on model 14 now. After the 13s came out last year, I was able to find the 12s, which I was currently running in, for $60/pair rather than their normal $150/pair retail. This strategy doesn't completely address the need to evaluate new models, but it can at least make it 2-3 year cycle rather than an annual event, if the shoe is being updated every year.