I think everyone will accept it come early next year. For me it would be the quicker time for loading points not ROFR. I hated that the previous owner still had access to MY points for so long after closing. It was a huge stress.
The general rule of thumb in the timeshare industry is that the "cost of inventory" is at most somewhere between 1/4 and 1/3 of the total cost of the product you are selling. (The biggest cost component? Marketing at 40-50%.) That's cost not sales price. So even if they weren't making a dime of profit on any sale, it's better to build a shiny new resort than to ROFR a resale at anything more than about 1/3 of the direct price. Because there is...
Though I am at a bit of a loss as to why they took these back, given what I am guessing about values.
The general rule of thumb in the timeshare industry is that the "cost of inventory" is at most somewhere between 1/4 and 1/3 of the total cost of the product you are selling. (The biggest cost component? Marketing at 40-50%.) That's cost not sales price. So even if they weren't making a dime of profit on any sale, it's better to build a shiny new resort than to ROFR a resale at anything more than about 1/3 of the direct price. Because there is...
Though I am at a bit of a loss as to why they took these back, given what I am guessing about values.
Sure, but if I am even in the ballpark on my analysis, that's not the same as "this is a steady supply of super profitable points." The steady supply of super profitable points comes from shiny new stick-built resorts.
I maintain the easiest explanation for any ROFR decision is Drunken Monkey.
Sure, but if I am even in the ballpark on my analysis, that's not the same as "this is a steady supply of super profitable points." The steady supply of super profitable points comes from shiny new stick-built resorts.
I maintain the easiest explanation for any ROFR decision is Drunken Monkey.