Bing Showei
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2017
- Messages
- 1,579
Sure they do. As a seller, you are free to ask for whatever you want for your contract. Let's take AKV and how it now works on Fidelity. An AKV contracts could be had right now for between $105 and $115. If you told Fidelity (or any broker) that you wanted to list $10 above whatever their asking recommendation is (and they all have a recommendation - "this is I think we can move the contract for," "we've been seeing contracts taken for this amount," etc.) all that will do is help to sell the contracts of those who have elected to sell with that broker on their recommended pricing. Your $125 AKV contract will sit on Fidelity's site while the next seller comes in at what looks, next to your contract, to be a reasonable and attractive $115 contract. Ask what you will, but deviating from the brokers norm is unlikely to yield much success.Still missing something. Doesn’t the seller set the price, not the agency.
I don't think anyone is arguing otherwise. Disney used to pass along owners who were delinquent on their loans and wanted out to Fidelity. Prices on Fidelity are low for a reason.I still argue their commission is much less to half of other resale companies. If I am a seller I would list the price I wanted with the agency I thought would sell my property and give me a fair commission percentage.
Right now, the same exact 160pt AKV contract on Fidelity is selling at DVCResale Market. At Fidelity, it's $110/pt. At DVCRM $116/pt.
At DVCRM, seller pays $1,578 on that sale but takes home $16,982.
At Fidelity, seller pays $1,056 on that sale but takes home $16,720.
If sold at asking*, seller may pay almost twice the commission, but they actually take home more with DVCRM.
In practice contracts sold on Fidelity and other sites don't reach the point of there being a $20-$25/pt differential. And as a buyer, it will often make sense to eat the "garbage fee" for the price difference that's there. My only point is that by redistributing their take-home by moving costs from the seller to the buyer, they're able to move more volume with lower prices that would be unachievable should the $195 fee need to come by way of 5% commission.I would gladly pay the $195 fee as the buyer instead of paying $20-25 more a point for similar contracts on other sites. For a 200 point contract, that is $4000-5000 in savings. Like I said, unless I am missing something.
*ETA - @TexasChick123 makes a key point below, which is that DVCRM will regularly set asking prices high with the understanding that the price will be negotiated down. Given that reality, the delta in commission is closed even further and the defrayment of commission put on the buyer is even more shrewd.
Last edited: