auntie
<font color=darkorchid>It's a really lovely way to
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2003
- Messages
- 7,311
So what if they don't go in the parks. They can do what is within the limits of the law with that site. There are people that camp all winter and all summer, should we kick them out because they are using up "too much" of the Fort?
Whoa...I don't have an issue with them not going to the parks..that's exactly my point. They use the resort for the great amenities it offers.
Where as most folks in a value resort (from many of the posts I've read) feel they don't want to pay alot for a place where they only sleep. Meaning they're not choosing it for it's amenities. Where as the folks who want a site in FW often are visiting to enjoy the resort itself. Seems a shame, is all I'm saying if they aren't able to do so, because someone who isn't staying on property anywhere wants an extra magic hour. Of course anyone can do whatever they want if it's within the law. I'm merely commenting that I would feel badly for those who had to miss out on a vacation because someone wanted an extra hour of "magic" and never set forth so much as a foot into the campground.


. People should be able to do whatever they like within the limits of the law with a site they rent. I don't like it but, I don't like people that drive slower than the speed limit in the left lane or people that pull up to the drivethru window and act like the've never been to Mcdonalds before ( big Mac, 1/4pounder, Filet O Fish, it's not a new Menu everyday people, excluding the occasional Mcribb etc. ). My point is that lots of people do lots of things that I don't like and thats just the way things are. I'm sure I do plenty of stuff that others don't like and if I don't, I promise to try harder
.

What a good idea!
