It is kind of silly to keep using the VA and the TSA as horrible examples of what can happen to your information. Nothing came of the VA incident. I was notified that my info was on the stolen laptop, and then was notified that the laptops were recovered without a breech of the information. If you are going to site examples...site some where something negative happened.
Something negative DID happen. Laptops with tens of thousands of peoples' personal info were lost or stolen, laptops which were not supposed to have that info on them in the first place. The fact that the government claims that the info was not breached does not negate the fact that they are putting sensitive info onto laptops and then the laptops are getting lost or stolen. How many more laptops out there have sensitive info on them and are being left on tables at Starbucks while some idiot public servant goes to the john?
I'll draw another analogy - were you livid when Michael Jackson dangled his baby over a balcony? Nothing happened, the kid was perfectly fine. But the huge level of risk alone was enough to cause serious concern for anybody who saw it. Same thing with the laptops; maybe no data was compromised this time, but the sheer level of risk alone makes the whole incident deeply disturbing to those of us whose personal info resides in the VA or TSA computers. mnext time we might not be so lucky, so we better take steps to reduce this risk before it happens again.
I still would like someone to explain how the fingercheck used by Disney could be used to gain access to any other information?
I have read the thread so keep your little superior postings to yourself.
I was responding to the point regarding writing a letter to the Mortgage company, you may have had to go further but that was not in the post I responded to.
The point regarding worse than DNA(my risght arm to enter Disney) was in jest but I was not getting a similar tone from you.
With regard to losing $5000 from your bank account I know Disney has credit card and adress information but just where does the finger scan help the fraudster?
For an exact, specific enumeration of WHY I dislike the finger scan, see my post #76 at the top of Page 6 in this thread. I'm not being superior, I'm just saying, I already answered that question at least twice already - see my previous posts for the answer.
1) I guess some people have something to hide.
2) The biometrics is not a fingerprint.
3) But, those who feel guilty (or ARE guilty) would certainly object.
1) Completely correct - I do have something to hide - it's called MY RIGHT TO PRIVACY. Don't you? If not, post your name, address and phone number on the open boards. I bet you won't - because you value your privacy. And so do I.
2) Maybe not, but it is undeniably a piece of data that can be used to identify a specific person. It doesn't matter if it's a fingerprint or a series of 1s and 0s that represent a fingerprint, or a sample of DNA - it's a unique identifier that points to a specific person.
3) WRONG. I don't feel guilty of anything - but I dislike having my privacy impinged upon. How would you like it if I read your diary or peeked into your windows? Both are invasions of your privacy, and so is the fingerscan, albiet to a lesser extent.