...People see their time in queue as a burden because other, less moral people are spending much less time in queue and getting the same service. After a threshold, the practice begins to incentise people to be violators more than the decency incentives them to be moral. A community has the right and obligation to condemn any action that would lead towards such a death-spiral.
poohandwendy said:....I amazes me that people really care all that much about splitting hairs so much that this is such an issue. (when they start thread after thread about where you can used the darned things)
Reflection said:I completely agree with this view. There are times, however, especially on the various boards, when it seems to me that community outrage and condemnation (a pretty good incentive, I'd say, for the behavior/practice outlined above) is stopped by the 'don't comment or judge until you've walked a mile in my shoes brigade.'
This is a great thread and offers lots of food for thought.![]()
chobie said:Either way, who cares what any one person thinks as long as they are not knowlingly violating a rule?
What is interesting to me is that if people do not see the a clear line from a to b (my actions-directly affecting others), they seem to assume the action is small enough to not matter. If it affects the corporations bottom line even in a small way, why isn't that enough?Line jumping, lying about a child's age for price breaks, treating the fixin's bar as a personal salad bar, consuming the majority of food and beverage items in concierge, for examples, are actions that do affect others.
chobie said:Really, people use the don't judge until you've walked a mile in my shoes for refillable mug threads?

Lanshark said:start thowing pixie dust bombs at each other.

poohandwendy said:What is interesting to me is that if people do not see the a clear line from a to b (my actions-directly affecting others), they seem to assume the action is small enough to not matter.
It's like outright lie vs 'white lie'....
I mean, the issue is refillable mugs for the length of your stay, at the resort of your stay. It is marked ON THE MUG for petes sake. If there is any confusion whatsoever, there are CMs every 10 feet you can ask. Disney should not have to plaster it all over the place to have a reasonable expectation that people should follow it. They aren't robbing people, not pulling the wool over anyones eyes. The limitations are not unreasonable. I really do not understand how that can turn into a shade of gray...maybe right/maybe wrong issue?
For goodness sakes, adults should not need the rules spoonfed to them.
We will just have to agree to disagree. I do think it is unreasonable for people to require more than what is currently offered before making the refillable mug 'investment'. I suspect people will still do whatever they want to do, no matter what is posted.chobie said:At PC there is a big display of mugs with a sign that says unlimited refills and that is all it says. Yes, the policy is written on the mugs, sideways, in tiny print. It is unreasonable, IMO, to expect people to see that when they first buy them.
And as for asking the CM, I had my DH do that, just because of all these threads...and the CM told him he could bring them back and reuse them at another stay. And many others have reported this same thing being said to them and the people who have an issue with people reusing the mugs have all sorts of rationalizations for this (they cms don't want to offend the customers etc)
So, IMO, WDW is causing part of this problem. Sure, blame the people who did not see the 4point font policy, because they did not turn their cup over sideways and read the that is obscured by the handle, but I think WDW is not helping the situation.
No they don't have to plaster it all over, but they could put it on the sign and IMO that would be a reasonable thing to do.
No, we won't do it despite what the CM said --so spare me the lecture.
If it affects the corporations bottom line even in a small way, why isn't that enough?

poohandwendy said:We will just have to agree to disagree. I do think it is unreasonable for people to require more than what is currently offered before making the refillable mug 'investment'. I suspect people will still do whatever they want to do, no matter what is posted.
If a CM gives out incorrect info, yes that is a problem WDW will have to deal with. As with anything else.
bicker said:Has anyone else gotten the feeling that there have been a lot more postings, recently, from people trying to get ratification for bad behavior that they planned to commit? I wonder what it is about this time of year that might cause that.

poohandwendy said:Just for the fun of it, I pulled one of my CR mugs out of the back of the cabinet.
Under the handle, in red letters, 10pt font (I measured it) is the following:
Free refills until the end of your stay
Refills only at location purchased
Very easy to read, message clearly stated. I cannot imagine why any more effort is needed. Placing it anywhere else on the mug would take away from the design. JMHO

poohandwendy said:LOL, I would be willing to bet that they put it on the mug because that is a permanent reminder. When someone says "I didn't see a sign...there was no sign...you didn't disclose the rules" They can say, you are holding the rules in your hand.
Yes, it is totally splitting hairs, but it is a rule, it is disclosed. There is no bait and switch or shady move here. It's pretty simple.
Again, I will agree to disagree here. On my mug, it is perfectly easy to notice and read the rules.chobie said:I agree that once a person has looked at every inch of their mug and read the fine print, they should not break the rule. But I do think its shady of them not to put on the sign and not to tell CMs to tell people the policy when asked.
poohandwendy said:LOL, I would be willing to bet that they put it on the mug because that is a permanent reminder. When someone says "I didn't see a sign...there was no sign...you didn't disclose the rules" They can say, you are holding the rules in your hand.
Yes, it is totally splitting hairs, but it is a rule, it is disclosed. There is no bait and switch or shady move here. It's pretty simple.
Btw, you brought the issue of where the rules are posted and how small the font was, to the table. Not I. I can't understand why you would have an issue with it being discussed in depth?
poohandwendy said:Again, I will agree to disagree here. On my mug, it is perfectly easy to notice and read the rules.![]()
Perhaps you should send your thoughts and concerns to WDW directly, so they can address the issue?