SueM in MN
combining the teacups with a roller coaster
- Joined
- Aug 23, 1999
- Messages
- 36,350
Yes, they were "natural" quints. Here's a website about them.Wasn't there another set of "natural " quints in the '70s? Kiennast or something similar? I remember them being featured in a lot of magazines when they were little. I think the dad couldn't handle the strain (they had other two children before the quints) and he killed himself when they were like 14 yrs old![]()
NoIf that's true -and I believe it is- then that means that the Dionne quints would have been natural octuplets and three didn't survive? Or is that impossible?
ETA: I don't even know much (or anything) about those things, so the above may be a really dumb question)
A single egg was twinned once to produce Yvonne & Annette, and then twinned twice to produce Cecile and another egg. This other egg split to produce Emilie and Marie.
Emilie was a 'mirror image' of Marie and was left handed, while all the others were right handed.
This is the website I got the information from, but I have read it in different books. The Dionne Quintuplets were the most studied children of their time (they basically were treated as exotic creatures in a nice zoo). They were cataloged down to who had hair whirls and which way they whirled, weighed and measured daily, even had all their stools measured.
This is a cool site about the Dionne Quintuplets. They had a very sad story. There are 2 interesting books about them; one was written in the late 1960s by the Quints who were still alive at the time and is titled "We Were Five." The other was written with their cooperation around 1995 and is titled "Family Secrets".



However there are factors that help explain identicals, some have suggested that the older you get the weaker the eggs you carry are, thus the easier for them to split into twins. 
This is what I looked like carrying twins in my 5' body.