Photo Sharing: Ultra Wide Angle

Now I'm not one to shy away from spending money on a lens, (:rotfl2:) and I love my ultra wide's, but that's a big price difference for 2mm IMO unless the 12-24 is not a good lens (which I don't believe to be true). I've had a 10-20, an 11-18 and a 12-24 as I've changed camera bodies etc. I switched from the 10-20 to the 11-18 b/c I prefered the colors produced by the coating better on the 11-18 and the 1mm wasn't that different. Then when I got full frame I got the 12-24mm which was a full frame lens. I now use that on the crop body b/c the difference between 12mm and 11mm did not make that big of a difference. If anything for a crop sensor I'd look for an 8-16mm or such b/c you do start to see a difference by that point. Just my opinion you didn't ask for! :rotfl:

All opinions help! Thanks:)
I went to Ritz this a.m. and had them have a Tamron 10-24mm shipped to the store so I could try it out on my camera, hopefully on Monday. They don't stock them:confused3 How do you sell lenses if you don't have them? Both the manager and the girl I talked to each own one and really like it. I am still very intrigued by the used Nikon 12-24 and since I have never used an ultrawide, I wouldn't miss 10mm but looking at pictures taken with both last night for hours on Flickr, the Tamron's looked good to my untrained eye so I am going to at least give it a look.
 
Now I'm not one to shy away from spending money on a lens, (:rotfl2:) and I love my ultra wide's, but that's a big price difference for 2mm IMO unless the 12-24 is not a good lens (which I don't believe to be true). I've had a 10-20, an 11-18 and a 12-24 as I've changed camera bodies etc. I switched from the 10-20 to the 11-18 b/c I prefered the colors produced by the coating better on the 11-18 and the 1mm wasn't that different. Then when I got full frame I got the 12-24mm which was a full frame lens. I now use that on the crop body b/c the difference between 12mm and 11mm did not make that big of a difference. If anything for a crop sensor I'd look for an 8-16mm or such b/c you do start to see a difference by that point. Just my opinion you didn't ask for! :rotfl:

I think I saw a Sigma 8-16mm somewhere in my travels online.
 
All opinions help! Thanks:)
I went to Ritz this a.m. and had them have a Tamron 10-24mm shipped to the store so I could try it out on my camera, hopefully on Monday. They don't stock them:confused3 How do you sell lenses if you don't have them? Both the manager and the girl I talked to each own one and really like it. I am still very intrigued by the used Nikon 12-24 and since I have never used an ultrawide, I wouldn't miss 10mm but looking at pictures taken with both last night for hours on Flickr, the Tamron's looked good to my untrained eye so I am going to at least give it a look.

All reports I've heard from people who have bought the Tamron 10-24mm have been very good. And being a little less expensive than the Nikon 12-24 and a little wider it sounds positive.

I think I saw a Sigma 8-16mm somewhere in my travels online.

Yes, that's one of Sigma's newer lens - the APS-C version of their 12-24mm. I'd be going for that one over the $900 Nikon 10-24. Less expensive and for me the wide part is more important than having a bigger range.

If you hadn't found a nice deal on the Nikon 12-24 it probably wouldn't be such a hard decision would it! :goodvibes
 
All reports I've heard from people who have bought the Tamron 10-24mm have been very good. And being a little less expensive than the Nikon 12-24 and a little wider it sounds positive.

I bought the Tamron 10-24mm for my 50D a couple of weeks ago and I've been happy with it so far!
 

All reports I've heard from people who have bought the Tamron 10-24mm have been very good. And being a little less expensive than the Nikon 12-24 and a little wider it sounds positive.



Yes, that's one of Sigma's newer lens - the APS-C version of their 12-24mm. I'd be going for that one over the $900 Nikon 10-24. Less expensive and for me the wide part is more important than having a bigger range.

If you hadn't found a nice deal on the Nikon 12-24 it probably wouldn't be such a hard decision would it! :goodvibes

Definitely wouldn't be as hard! I am pulled toward the Nikon name even though I have seen plenty of great pictures from other makers.
 
This thread got me very interested in a UWA lens. I was looking at that Sigma and it looks really nice. However, due to the curvature of the lens, you can't put a filter on it. It is also more prone to getting scratched, dinged and is harder to clean. But I'm loving that it is 8 mm and not a fisheye!
 
a1_DSC_0739.jpg
 
Jamian, is this shot HDR? It's beautiful. I have a similar shot but not at all as nice as yours!

Thanks. Yes it is HDR. I used the exposure blending feature in Photomatix. It also required the use of some local adjustment brushes in Lightroom to bring down the bright lights in the fountain. I tried to make it as subtle as possible, not like the cartoon-looking HDR you see sometimes (which I've been guilty of at times...).
 
Thanks. Yes it is HDR. I used the exposure blending feature in Photomatix.
Yes, that Exposure Fusion mode in Photomatix is a great tool. Sometimes I use it alone; other times I might make both a tone-mapped and a fused version of an image and combine them in layers using Photoshop.

Scott
 
Doing some shooting this weekend for work. Theme is Austin Lawmakers.
Here's the TX Capitol from this morning.

txcap_04_hdr-XL.jpg
 


Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE









DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom