Pentax general discussion

Bright bold colors are very important to me. I can't stand washed out over exposed pictures. I am also a beginner. How does the K-X do with this on automatic settings? I will eventually learn how to use it but, for the time being I will be using the automatic settings.
 
Bright bold colors are very important to me. I can't stand washed out over exposed pictures. I am also a beginner. How does the K-X do with this on automatic settings? I will eventually learn how to use it but, for the time being I will be using the automatic settings.

Having upgraded from the K100d to the K-x, I can tell you that the K-x is an improvement and is pretty good at getting the correct exposure. There is one thing that you must know though. Every camera is a piece of equipment that is not intelligent. There are always going to be scenes that fool any camera's meter and you must use exposure compensation or full manual mode to overcome this. Exposure compensation should be one of the first things that people learn, but it is often ignored.

For white balance, I believe the K-x does above average on indoor shots that often are a little over red on many cameras. There is a custom menu setting that must be set, but it only takes about ten seconds to do so and it stays in that setting once you do it.
 
Having upgraded from the K100d to the K-x, I can tell you that the K-x is an improvement and is pretty good at getting the correct exposure. There is one thing that you must know though. Every camera is a piece of equipment that is not intelligent. There are always going to be scenes that fool any camera's meter and you must use exposure compensation or full manual mode to overcome this. Exposure compensation should be one of the first things that people learn, but it is often ignored.

For white balance, I believe the K-x does above average on indoor shots that often are a little over red on many cameras. There is a custom menu setting that must be set, but it only takes about ten seconds to do so and it stays in that setting once you do it.

Any good lesson plan concerning exposure compensation that you can forward my way? I've yet to even touch on it in class.
 

Having upgraded from the K100d to the K-x, I can tell you that the K-x is an improvement and is pretty good at getting the correct exposure. There is one thing that you must know though. Every camera is a piece of equipment that is not intelligent. There are always going to be scenes that fool any camera's meter and you must use exposure compensation or full manual mode to overcome this. Exposure compensation should be one of the first things that people learn, but it is often ignored.

For white balance, I believe the K-x does above average on indoor shots that often are a little over red on many cameras. There is a custom menu setting that must be set, but it only takes about ten seconds to do so and it stays in that setting once you do it.

Thanks I only own a P&S at the moment. My sister in law has a Canon and to me all of her pics looked washed out. I just wanted to avoid that :goodvibes
 
minnieforme:
youtube videos are your friend!:thumbsup2
Just go to youtube, and type in any term you need to learn. IE: exposure, ISO, f-stop, depth of field, etc.
You can watch them till your heart's content.:goodvibes
Thats what I'm doing. I signed up for some local classes but had to cancel because the dates conflicted with my second business. So I looked into online classes, but I feared I would't have enough time to complete them as planned by the online schedule. So i just watch youtube videos!
I can watch them in MY free time, and I can jump around topics according to what seems to come next.
I particularly like the videos shot by Bryan Peterson and the various photography classes that give you sneak peeks into their online video series'.

I have purchased several DVds from ebay and Amazon, but none have been as much help as the [{FREE]} youtube videos.
 
/
Here are a few of my recent re-processed pictures from my last trip in November. I tried to take some of Groucho's suggestion and cool the white balance a little more than originally and then of course, tried out Topaz to them.

766685186_fpJMq-L-1.jpg


766695197_tq47u-L-2.jpg


766698649_o5tGU-L-1.jpg


753451962_4TsDJ-L-1.jpg
 
I need some opinions.

I currently have a K100, but my DH is offering to get me a K-x. I am not sure if I should get that or wait and possibly get the K-7. I also have my eye on a wide angle lens, but that will be put on the back burner if I get a new body (I have no issue with waiting on this lens).

I love my current camera and I have no problem waiting for another camera. I do want to upgrade eventually, but I am just not sure when.

So, would you get the K-x now or wait?
 
I remembered that first shot that you posted and that's what I was trying to go for, but it seemed like when I started to get the lights where I wanted everything else was too blue. White balance is probably what I have some of the hardest time with (as you can tell!) Here is my next attempt, without the HDR, using only PS Elements and Topaz.

topaz.jpg

Sorry, I just got back to this thread for the first time in a few days. I like the colors in this shot much better than your first two attempts... of course, that's just my opinion, but there it is. :) The other shots you posted look like they have nice white balance, too.

Thanks I only own a P&S at the moment. My sister in law has a Canon and to me all of her pics looked washed out. I just wanted to avoid that :goodvibes
Usually there should be settings for that kind of thing. "Image tone" or something similar. You can also usually manually turn the saturation up slightly, that will give you brighter, punchier colors (sometimes unrealistically so - you might find skin tones going too red if you turn it up too much.)

I need some opinions.

I currently have a K100, but my DH is offering to get me a K-x. I am not sure if I should get that or wait and possibly get the K-7. I also have my eye on a wide angle lens, but that will be put on the back burner if I get a new body (I have no issue with waiting on this lens).

I love my current camera and I have no problem waiting for another camera. I do want to upgrade eventually, but I am just not sure when.

So, would you get the K-x now or wait?
Both cameras are big upgrades over the K100D! With the K-x, you will lose the red focus lights in the viewfinder, but you'll still have the green hexagon to tell you that it's grabbed focus.

Do you feel like you've outgrown the K100D's controls, or are you still happy with it? The K-x will have a similar number of external controls (though several more functions are easily available, like ISO, WB, etc.) The K-7 will give you many more controls, including a front dial under your index finger. The K-7 also is weathersealed, has a larger and higher resolution LCD screen, bigger and brighter viewfinder, built-in level, and can do 30fps videos. (And lots of other upgrades.) The K-x, on the other hand, is notably smaller and lighter and has better high ISO performance (at least a full stop better, I'd say.)

Oh, and the K-x comes in all those pretty colors. Basic black only for the K-7. ;)
 
Both cameras are big upgrades over the K100D! With the K-x, you will lose the red focus lights in the viewfinder, but you'll still have the green hexagon to tell you that it's grabbed focus.

Do you feel like you've outgrown the K100D's controls, or are you still happy with it? The K-x will have a similar number of external controls (though several more functions are easily available, like ISO, WB, etc.) The K-7 will give you many more controls, including a front dial under your index finger. The K-7 also is weathersealed, has a larger and higher resolution LCD screen, bigger and brighter viewfinder, built-in level, and can do 30fps videos. (And lots of other upgrades.) The K-x, on the other hand, is notably smaller and lighter and has better high ISO performance (at least a full stop better, I'd say.)

Oh, and the K-x comes in all those pretty colors. Basic black only for the K-7. ;)

I was hoping you would respond. You are the reason I ended up with my K100. :)

I have been reading reviews for days now and I think the only thing that makes me hesistant to buy the K-x is that I do not want to outgrow it (though I am still a beginner).

Oh, and I would probably stick to black, though the navy did look kind of cool.
 
The viewfinder is definitely the way to go. I use mine with glasses all the time - though I do switch to contacts during the day when I'm at Disney, and it does make using the viewfinder easier. But viewfinder beats Live View any day! Once you get used to it, you'll find it much more intuitive. The only downside is the nose smudges on the LCD. :)

You probably realize that if you want to focus in Live View mode, you can hold down the AF button. It's slow and only really works well on static objects, but it does work (and even does face detection.)
 
I wouldn't worry about outgrowing the K-x. By and large, it can still do the vast majority of the things the K-7 can do, but changing some settings can be a little slower... but even that isn't so bad since the four-way buttons on the back double as shortcuts for ISO, WB, flash, and picture settings. The only annoyance I find with it is that you can't turn the status screen off - it will often show a screen showing you all your current settings. Fine, but if I do a half-press on the shutter, I want the LCD to go black - and it won't always, the status screen stays on for a few seconds unless you press Info twice. On the K-7, you can turn it off. It can still be accessed via the Info button then, but won't show unless you ask for it, which I prefer.
 
The viewfinder is definitely the way to go. I use mine with glasses all the time - though I do switch to contacts during the day when I'm at Disney, and it does make using the viewfinder easier. But viewfinder beats Live View any day! Once you get used to it, you'll find it much more intuitive. The only downside is the nose smudges on the LCD. :)

You probably realize that if you want to focus in Live View mode, you can hold down the AF button. It's slow and only really works well on static objects, but it does work (and even does face detection.)

Of course, I didn't know it. I'm not even close to finishing the manual yet!

I'm really, really liking my camera. I carried it all weekend. I am so surprised that I've been able to shoot with the viewfinder with no problem. I can't thank all of you enough (back about a year ago) when you told me to look beyond Nikon and Canon.
 
Great! Glad to hear that you're having fun. Feel free to ask any other questions that we might be able to help you with! :thumbsup2
 
I am currently looking at the Canon T2i, but see so many people on here who love their Pentax. What are the advantages ofthe Pentax? Is it easy to use? I am a budding photographer- mostly just vacation and family pics. I am looking for the most bang for my buck, but need to understand "why" the Pentax may be a better choice over the Canon. TIA!
 
It depends on a few things. The main thing is budget. If the T2i is a stretch on your budget, then the K-x is a really nice alternative. If you can spend a little more than the T2i, then the K-7 would be even better! It is only about $100 more and is on a whole different level. Below is a little breakdown from my point of view.

T2i
Probably the "best" entry level DSLR out right now, but the price reflects that as well. The kit lens is not as nice as either of the kit lenses Pentax offers. Optically all are pretty much equal but the Pentax beats it at build quality. It is hard to argue that the Pentax kit lens is not the best built kit lens around. Also, the front of the lens rotates on the Canon, making petal hoods and polarizing filters difficult to use. The T2i has the most MPs, but honestly I do not see this as much of an advantage. I just recently moved from 6MP to 12MP and hardly see much of a difference. Frame your shot well and you do not have to worry about cropping too often. The high ISO performance is pretty much the same as the K-x, so no big advantage there. The LCD is a little larger and has a higher resolution than both Pentax options, but this is still not a deal sealer to me. My 0.3" smaller LCD on my K-x is plenty for 99.9% of my needs. It has the slowest FPS burst mode of the three and that is a big deal if you shoot anything with high action. It does have the best video mode if that is really important to you. Basically, while the T2i has a lot too offer, I just think it is way too overpriced.

K-x
It has what many consider to be the best high ISO performance of any APS-C DSLR. It has a very comfortable feel to me (the Rebels do not feel right to me, but is just my opinion). the kit lens included with the K-x is really nice. The front of the lens does not rotate when focusing, making the use of petal hoods and rotating filters easy to use. Unfortunately, Pentax no longer include the hood for free like they used to do. One of the big benefits of the Pentax models is the in-body IS, making it work on every lens you ever use. This is a per lens option for Canon and adds to the cost of each lens with it. There are also some lenses that do not even have an IS version. It has a slightly faster max shutter speed at 1/6000 compared to 1/4000 on the T2i. The K-7 is the fastest of the three at 1/8000. The FPS on the K-x is 4.7 compared to 3.7 of the T2i. The video is pretty good at 720p. The Pentax models offer more flash options over the T2i, such as Slow Sync, Rear curtain, and Wireless. Lastly, it comes in a handful of different colors! From retail, you can get black, red, navy, or white. There are a few more colors if ordered off the Pentax USA website. The thing with that option is that you pay 100% retail price where you save ~$100-150 through somewhere like Adorama or B&H.

K-7
This model is on a different level. It has more controls available on the body than the other two models, such as dedicated buttons and a second wheel. Also, it is water resistant. You cannot take it underwater, but you can feel safe using it is a light rain, at the beach, or on water rides. The kit lens included is also water resistant. It is also even more solidly built than the K-x kit lens. Where the K-x beats it is at high ISO. The K-7 is a good performer, but the K-x is again one of the very best.

In summary, I personally think that the K-x is the best for the money since it is a few hundred less than the T2i or the K-7 and even out paces the T2i at some things. If something like water resistance is important or you want a sturdier intermediate body then the K-7 would be the best and is also a great deal for the money.

I hope this was helpful.
 
Hi:
I've only had my Pentax K-X for a week so I'm definitely a beginner. It is extremely easy to use and so far I love it. The price was also a big selling point for me. I purchased the K-X with the two lens kit for $591 at Sams Club.
 

PixFuture Display Ad Tag




New Posts









Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top