lenshanem said:
ducklite, I did read your posts.
I'm not about keeping a child from eating either, but surely a child can be feed something from the attendant that would hold them over until they can get off the plane to eat their PB&J or small bag of peanuts. I work at a preschool and I know all about meltdowns and snack time.
If another child's life is at risk I would gladly hold off on giving a PB&J for a few hours and taking whatever the attendant has to satisfy my child until we can get off. I don't believe for a second that line - My child will ONLY eat PB&J. That is once again a sign of how selfish this society is.
That's fine, and like I said, if there was something SUITABLE to feed them (and a bag of chips is not suitable), then of course the reasonable thing would be to leave the PB&J packed away. But what if the "snack" would have been peanuts, so the FA's are just not serving any snack.
Like I said there's got to be some reasonable compromise, and expecting kids to go hungry is not reasonable.
If the carrier is assuming the responsibility of transporting the peanut allergic passenger, then they also owe a due diligence to the other passengers to inform them IN ADVANCE so they can plan any meals and snacks they plan on bringing aboard appropriately. This is something that parents of peanut allergic kids should be lobbying for. I am not talking about the selfish person who wants to snack on c*cktail peanuts, but rather families who are packing PB&J for a meal.
We're talking not about adults here that have had this allergy for years, we're talking about parents with small children who are scared and concerned for their child's life.
So you are saying a child's life is more important than an adults? I'm not understanding the intent of this statement.
It is totally natural for a parent to be protective. I find it amazing that anyone would question the fear of a parent putting their child on an airplane up in the air in an enclosed environment, close to everyone, recirculated air and seats that have been covered by repeated peanut dust. And the worst part? You can't get off!
You are contradicting yourself. If the peanut dust is already all over the plane, then what good does it do to have a peanut frr flight?
There have been situations where reactions occurred on airplanes - it was just last month Good Morning America had a story on peanut allergies and about a boy who reacted on an airplane while the peanuts were being passed out. This allergy is growing for whatever reason and it is just something that is gonna have to be dealt with despite those who can't forgo their PB&J for a few hours...
Like I said, in my scenario the kids haven't eaten for five hours already. To deny food for another three is wrong. No one is going to convince me that a child is going to have an anaphylactic shock from someone eating PB&J (not peanuts) 150 feet away--be it in a park, on a plane, or in a school. Please give me some proof that this has ever happened on a plane. PEANUT BUTTER, not peanuts.
Edited to add - I actually don't mind a child eating a PB&J (Course, I'd be concerned if it was like an entire class.) cause my daughter has not reacted in that situation. But, I surely would not belittle the concern of another parent that feels uncomfortable with it. I do know that every child can react differently and in all actuality none of us know how severe the next reaction will be. I personally wouldn't want to be up in the air to find out.
I wasn't belittling anyone. Just being very factual. Like I said, accomodation is a two way street.
Anne