LuvOrlando
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 22,250
-
Wondering if the 23-month old from Texas had been to Mexico or if picked it up from someone in the US?
Sad.
Not thrilled that DH will be flying on business next week.Airports, planes, hotel, convention....oh my.
Also, how long for test results to come back? I'm watching the news and some states are waiting on test results for more cases to be confirmed. Seems like they've been saying that for a couple of days.
I have to disagree here. Worry does have value, as long as it isn't self destructive. Worry keeps many of us from making incredibly bad decisions because it acts as a deterrent. One of my favorite authors Gavin DeBecker, named one of his books "The Gift or Fear" because fear really does make a valid contribution to our survival.
Here is an example of worry being an advantage:
If a person worries about about the possibility of being hit by a car walking at night he or she will likely exercise some caution staying inside the pedestrian walkway, wearing brighter color clothing, and crossing at appropriate intersections. On the flip side you have the individual that refuses to see danger and meanders across the yellow line while wearing a black hoodie and jeans when the idea that a jay walk will save time flashes as a great idea. If you really do not see that one approach is better than another some of you are just on a different page than those who are like me.
Life isn't always pretty, and life isn't always easy but I look at it straight in the eye, deal with whatever is in my path then move on. At the moment this mess is right in front of me so I am dealing with it by collecting as much information as I can and by preparing my family in the best way I am able.
exactly! (I also have that book!) Especially if you do not ignore the worry as paranoia or as unfounded (I do not mean let it lead you to panic).....the worry can lead you to stay informed and to take action when necessary.
Over 12,000 kids die in car wrecks in the US every year.
Over 30 children in the US will die in car wrecks TODAY. Where is the panic for that?
and putting a little perspective on the current threat of dying from swine flu)experts - virologists,etc - were looking for it. Laurie Garrett stated on Charlie Rose that they had a H1N1 case in Texas in Sept and two in Cal in March and that then they knew they were looking at something going on. She also stated at the same time an H1N1 strain that is not sensitive to Tamiflu also developed. These people were fully tested and there is no conjecture to that. Did local authorities make this mistake, sure. However the experts have been following it.
I think your point though is to say there is no sense in closing the border - and the experts seem to be in agreement with that!![]()
I think we're talking about two different kinds of worry.
The beneficial kind is more a realistic awareness of danger. Such as the example of walking at night and taking proper precautions to be visible.
The "bad" kind is the wringing your hands, terrified something bad is going to happen, yet not doing anything to affect whether it does or not.
Another example: car wrecks, the number one killer of children in this country.
Almost 21% of childhood deaths are due to car wrecks, and 1 of every 60 children born today will die (eventually) in a car accidentOver 12,000 kids die in car wreck in the US every year.
Good "worry" - my children ride properly restrained in the back seat.
Bad worry: if I was afraid to let them get in a car, or if I drove around thinking "ohgosh-ohgosh-ohgosh-I hope no one runs into us - ohgosh-ohgosh-ohgosh" to the point where it negatively affects my own driving.
So learning how to protect yourself in a pandemic and taking basic prudent steps to do so is the "good" worry. Freaking out that we're all going to die a horrible death is the "bad worry."
It's terribly tragic about the child in Texas, but of course it's very sad when a child dies for any reason.Over 300 children in the US will die in car wrecks TODAY. Where is the panic for that?
(just playing Devil's Advocate. I don't think we need to panic, just properly restrain our kids, and ourselvesand putting a little perspective on the current threat of dying from swine flu)
I think we're talking about two different kinds of worry.

not one thing you say here is a correct interpretation of the points i was making. point 1. the media increases our anxiety. point 2. people tend to feed off of each others fears. point 3. worrying about future events cannot have an impact on them. point 4. as they say, this to shall pass. i never said anyone here is panicking. i never said reading the posts bothers me. as far as the statement about protesting to much, that buzz phrase is used when someone complains to cover up the fact that they really like the thing they are complaining about. that would suggest that in your opinion i really like the flu.![]()
Great points!
The "regular" flu kills roughly 36,000 people per year. I don't think this variant is showing itself to be any different here in the U.S. (statistically) but the jury is still out. I'm not overly worried about it but, dang, I thought we only had to go through ONE flu season a year and we just got out of it last month. This thing is going to run through and peak and go out just like all the others. Hopefully, the nice weather and people being outdoors will keep the number infected smaller than in winter time. As for Mexico, I have read that the reason for the high numbers and higher death rate was due to crowded living situations and poor health/self-care for most of the cases.
I agree!!!So does anyone know if there have been any deaths where the person was under the best healthcare available and still passed away because there was nothing they could do?
At this point it looks to me like the losses stemmed from people who only sought medical treatment after things got out way of hand if they sought help at all. I wish the papers would tell me more about the people who did pass away, put an identity to the number instead of making them a variable into which anyone could easily slide themselves. Did they rest? Were they already ill from something else? Did they have access to regular medicine like antibiotics? Did they have access to oxygen tanks when they couldn't breathe?
Seriously, what on earth are our reporters doing these days? Isn't there anyone out there who can actually behave like a journalist willing to 'get the story'??? Are the only folks left working at newspapers glory hounds and paparazzi following Madonna around while she does her latest Vogue shoot?If I want to know who Miley Cyrus is dating I can find it everywhere I look, if I was interested in a stars eating disorder I can get their best friends to spill the most intimate secrets to me & millions of others. BUT if I am interested in anything that remotely approaches relevant I get nothing. All the while the newspapers can't figure out why no-one cares what they have to say anymore
Really, could it be more obvious?

So does anyone know if there have been any deaths where the person was under the best healthcare available and still passed away because there was nothing they could do?
At this point it looks to me like the losses stemmed from people who only sought medical treatment after things got out way of hand if they sought help at all. I wish the papers would tell me more about the people who did pass away, put an identity to the number instead of making them a variable into which anyone could easily slide themselves. Did they rest? Were they already ill from something else? Did they have access to regular medicine like antibiotics? Did they have access to oxygen tanks when they couldn't breathe?
Seriously, what on earth are our reporters doing these days? Isn't there anyone out there who can actually behave like a journalist willing to 'get the story'??? Are the only folks left working at newspapers glory hounds and paparazzi following Madonna around while she does her latest Vogue shoot?If I want to know who Miley Cyrus is dating I can find it everywhere I look, if I was interested in a stars eating disorder I can get their best friends to spill the most intimate secrets to me & millions of others. BUT if I am interested in anything that remotely approaches relevant I get nothing. All the while the newspapers can't figure out why no-one cares what they have to say anymore
Really, could it be more obvious?
I understand some answers will take time but I am so frustrated with the lack of information about things that we SHOULD know.
So does anyone know if there have been any deaths where the person was under the best healthcare available and still passed away because there was nothing they could do?
At this point it looks to me like the losses stemmed from people who only sought medical treatment after things got out way of hand if they sought help at all. I wish the papers would tell me more about the people who did pass away, put an identity to the number instead of making them a variable into which anyone could easily slide themselves. Did they rest? Were they already ill from something else? Did they have access to regular medicine like antibiotics? Did they have access to oxygen tanks when they couldn't breathe?
Seriously, what on earth are our reporters doing these days? Isn't there anyone out there who can actually behave like a journalist willing to 'get the story'??? Are the only folks left working at newspapers glory hounds and paparazzi following Madonna around while she does her latest Vogue shoot?If I want to know who Miley Cyrus is dating I can find it everywhere I look, if I was interested in a stars eating disorder I can get their best friends to spill the most intimate secrets to me & millions of others. BUT if I am interested in anything that remotely approaches relevant I get nothing. All the while the newspapers can't figure out why no-one cares what they have to say anymore
Really, could it be more obvious?
I understand some answers will take time but I am so frustrated with the lack of information about things that we SHOULD know.
Great points!
The "regular" flu kills roughly 36,000 people per year. I don't think this variant is showing itself to be any different here in the U.S. (statistically) but the jury is still out. I'm not overly worried about it but, dang, I thought we only had to go through ONE flu season a year and we just got out of it last month. This thing is going to run through and peak and go out just like all the others. Hopefully, the nice weather and people being outdoors will keep the number infected smaller than in winter time. As for Mexico, I have read that the reason for the high numbers and higher death rate was due to crowded living situations and poor health/self-care for most of the cases.

Yes.....But of those 36,000 deaths, many are from the strains covered by the annual flu shot.....They're just victims who failed to get the flu shot. So MILLIONS of Americans didn't contract the flu in the first place because the immunization protected them. Meaning, millions and millions of Americans were are minimal risk (due to the vaccine) of ever even falling into that group of 36,000. Almost all that 36,000 consists of people who received no flu shot.
This swine flu has no vaccine, so all those vaccinated millions we normally factor out every year as being "safe" and at virtually no risk of dying can no longer be factored out. The "at risk" pool for contracting this flu has just gone up by millions, in the US alone. Then you take whatever percentage of unvaccinated people normally die from the flu they contract and I think the numbers have the potential to be MUCH higher than 36,000. It all depends on just how nasty this strain turns out to be. The lack of vaccine is key. Right now, we're sitting ducks.....We just don't know what's taking aim at us. A bullet or a foam dart?![]()
Yes.....But of those 36,000 deaths, many are from the strains covered by the annual flu shot.....They're just victims who failed to get the flu shot. So MILLIONS of Americans didn't contract the flu in the first place because the immunization protected them. Meaning, millions and millions of Americans were are minimal risk (due to the vaccine) of ever even falling into that group of 36,000. Almost all that 36,000 consists of people who received no flu shot.
This swine flu has no vaccine, so all those vaccinated millions we normally factor out every year as being "safe" and at virtually no risk of dying can no longer be factored out. The "at risk" pool for contracting this flu has just gone up by millions, in the US alone. Then you take whatever percentage of unvaccinated people normally die from the flu they contract and I think the numbers have the potential to be MUCH higher than 36,000. It all depends on just how nasty this strain turns out to be. The lack of vaccine is key. Right now, we're sitting ducks.....We just don't know what's taking aim at us. A bullet or a foam dart?![]()