bookwormde
<font color=darkorchid>Heading out now, another ad
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2008
- Messages
- 6,662
not looking to stay, just comparing if DVC is delaying opening longer than other timesharesYou would be better off contact whatever timeshare you want to stay at to see if they are open.
thanks, I found what looks like the full list for WyndhamI believe Club Wyndham will begin phased openings on 5/26. I’ll double check that, though.
Edit:
Yes, here are the Orlando ones with phased openings beginning 5/26.
View attachment 496668
I just think that they owe the members a timely and more in depth rational for not opening and why they can not give a date. We know the longer term damage (members point losses, more points than accommodation to use them etc) to the system mounts every day, The question is the short term benefit adequate?Wouldn't it be in the best interests of the system & membership if they wait to open the DL & WDW DVC resorts until the parks are open? How will they handle points that belong to those who won't go until at least then (who I believe vastly outnumber those who are chomping at the bit to go right now even if the parks aren't open). I realize that DVC can easily just apply the rules, but that isn't going to stop lots and lots of owners from complaining about losing money all over the internet. That can't be good for business (sales).
I know that the DVC contracts specifically state that the parks are not guaranteed to be there, but like it or not, Disney has to know that the vast majority of owners purchased because of the parks. It will not play well if they open the resorts before the parks. IMO, they are caught between the proverbial "rock and a hard place". No matter what they do, there will be lots of upset members. That being the case, they might just as well do what they think is right. YMMV.
FWIW, either way, I have nothing to lose (as far as DVC points go) and only hope that when they open resorts and parks, they don't need to shut them down again due to an unmanageable surge of cases needing hospitalization & ICU beds.
Disney is also aware that Florida has been engaging in selective reporting. The kind of selective reporting involved - not reporting positive tests and deaths of non-Florida residents, including visitors and snowbirds - is problematic for Disney.
I'm not aware of FL engaging in falsely reporting the stats in relation to CV-19; I'm curious to know your source. Thanks in advance.
![]()
Florida resident here. The daily reports my local and state government provide have stats for both Florida residents and non residents. Some of the issues was initially with the coroner’s office and death certificates. The State wanted to hold back the information the coroners office provided because they wanted to show where the infected person lived rather than where he died to try to get a more accurate picture of where the infections are.
For example, for any kind of hospitalizations I need I travel so Sarasota because their hospitals are far superior to the ones in my county. If I got infected and died there, the coroner would count it as a Sarasota death rather than my county. The Department of Health reports where the residential address is.
https://www.clickorlando.com/news/l...edical-examiners-database-of-covid-19-deaths/
A major point of contention between the Department of Health and medical examiners was the fact that DOH had been excluding non-resident deaths from its count. Whereas medical examiners count deaths where the person died, DOH's practice has been to count deaths based on the deceased's state of residence. This means that losses among seasonal residents — who account for over 1 million people — have been excluded from the state's death toll.
I believe this means they are not being counted, because most states count by deaths within their borders, not "legal residents dying somewhere."So does this mean that those people are counted but not in FL totals?
And if they died in Florida, the probably needed a bed in a Florida hospital and maybe an ICU bed as well.II believe this means they are not being counted, because most states count by deaths within their borders, not "legal residents dying somewhere."
The challenge is that regardless of where someone "got" it, if hospitalized in FL with it, they likely had FL contacts with it. That would be especially true in a resort area, which would be a specific concerns for Disney.
And if they died in Florida, the probably needed a bed in a Florida hospital and maybe an ICU bed as well.I
If they don't count them where they die, Florida is going to underestimate what is needed to care for people. That's not good!