But can't you see once you make the middle class more dependent on programs they are in the same boat of welfare recipients. The only difference is you have better paying job or a job of some kind. If you take more then you give, someone has to pay for this mess we have created.
In which case, you of course support living wage proposals so that someone who is working class can afford shelter, food and health insurance.
We have a number of unsustainable economic situations in our country. One is that the amount of wealth held by the top 5% is increasing disproporationally, and the top 1% even more so. Another is that income is doing the same thing (and wealth and income are conflated in these discussions, but are two very different things). A third, one that fights against the other two is that our middle class wants to maintain a middle class standard of living - that means having food, shelter, insurance - and having things above subsistence level because otherwise in this country you wouldn't be middle class, you'd be poor. But with the rich getting a bigger and bigger piece of the pie, and the poor not having any income to lose, the money that the rich take is coming from the middle class.
Hell, yes, there should be class welfare - I should get eaten. And from where I sit in the 5%, it really looks like we should all take pitchforks and torches to the 1%.