JimmyV
Por favor manténganse alejado de las puertas.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2008
- Messages
- 8,060
I used that wording because we ARE talking about a post someone has made on these boards. Do I believe they are the only ones that decided not to go back? Heck no. I am not an idiot. So I would appreciate it if you did not put words into my mouth or read into things that are not there.
What I AM saying is that Disney has been posting profits and increased attendance. So far, those who have decided not to return are not having a financial impact. It is not going to make Disney look at MBs, FP+, or prices and go "Well, this wasn't a good idea because some people decided not to come back." That will only happen when things reach a point where Disney is losing money. Obviously, Disney doesn't think it has found equilibrium with supply and demand and thus believe they can still increase prices.
1. I did not put words in your mouth. I quoted exactly what you wrote. If there was an implication in your earlier post that guest dissatisfaction was more pervasive, I missed it.
2. Disney does not "post attendance figures", so there is no way anyone on any side of any argument could use attendance increases or decreases to support their views on FP+. We simply have no way of evaluating its impact, especially when the vast majority of visitors since mid-January planned their trips far in advance of its implementation or known impact.
3. Disney is engaged in extensive follow-up studies to determine people's reaction. If you think that Disney looks at profit statements from 1/15-3/15 as its basis for weighing the impact or success of its new system, you give it way too little credit. If this were true, then we should expect no changes whatsoever to the system. Yet even FP+'s most ardent supporters are saying "give it a chance...this is still in the testing phase...we don't even know what the final product will look like." Do you think that adjustments will be made based purely on balance sheet statements or on guest feedback?



