bicker said:
I prefer just to deny benefits wherever practical. Simple things. Require a SS# for health benefits and for admission to schools, would be a good start.
Denying school benefits will not stop illegals from coming and bringing their children. So what would be the result of a policy like this? You'll have uneducated non-english-speaking children spending their days hanging out in convenience stores, for lack of anywhere else to go.
What happens to an uneducated non-english-speaking zero-job-skilled child who becomes an adult in this country?
He either (a) does what his parents do, dishwashing or whatever, or (b) becomes a criminal. Far more likely the latter. Someone is going to read this post and say "Dana, no, he can do (c), go back to his home country like he should." His home country is here. He was raised here. He has a tenuous connection to anywhere else.
I can understand the urge to "punish" illegals by stripping away services, under the logic that if we take away free health care and education, more of them will go home. The problem is - the logic doesn't work. They are here for the $7/hour and the food in their stomach. Free health care and education definitely sweeten life here, but they aren't main drivers. So why on earth would our policy be to provide this stuff?
Because it has major social implications for all of us. Say you have an illegal with a broken leg in Massachusetts - should we spend the couple of thousand dollars setting his leg? Would we rather dump him on a bus to Mexico with no treatment? (never mind that no doctor in good conscience could do that; they live by the Hippocratic). Here's a bigger one - lets say we have an illegal in Massachusetts with tuberculosis. Should we treat him? If we don't, there's a huge chance of an infestation, and these guys are washing restaurant dishes with their hands. At the end of the day, we can either tell illegals to medically suffer in silence or we can treat them and accept the cost as something we have to bear as the best country on earth. And knowing the ideology of so many posters before me, perhaps the best answer is to ask ourselves What Would Jesus Do. "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall be shown mercy."
How about education. Are we content as a society to create a second-class of illegal children in this country? What do we think will happen to them? They will pick our pockets and rob our homes in order to eat. Could it be that educating them keeps us safer over the long term?
We know this: legalizing abortion cut the American crime rate. (check out a book called Freakonomics if this interests you.) By similar logic, we can say with some certainty that cutting off education for illegal children will increase the American crime rate.
They aren't going home, guys. This is their only chance at a life that means anything. We can deport them but it makes zero sense for us economically to do that. So, we can decide how we want to apply our resources to mitigate their presence. Would we rather pay to treat the one case of TB, or treat the entire city when there's an infestation? Would we rather pay to educate the child now, or incarcerate him later?
Think long-term pragmatics.