YesterDark
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 1,508
We disagree and that's fine. At the end of the day I am never going to be happy about IPs at EPCOT because I think it spits in the face of what Walt wanted and what EPCOT is supposed to be. It's Disney going for cheap money grabs.
Not sure I agree with this language.
First, Walt's original vision would never have survived even if they decided to build a fully functional city with manufacturing and research areas. Epcot is for a world that didn't know what the internet, social media and smart phones were part of. More and more companies are moving to having employees working remotely with automation inside factories. Why would companies move research facilities to a crowded Orlando area where you have theme parks? They would totally be missing out on various tax benefits of being in different states around the country.
The original vision would never have survived, much like any indoor mall in the age of Amazon.
I always skeptical of anyone who says "what Walt wanted..." He was a creative force and it's impossible how he would have reacted to the innovation of the last 50 years.
Now to your second point of cheap money grabs, nothing about the rides and attractions and restaurants being added to Epcot is cheap. The Walt Disney Company has always been about making money, let's not forget that. If Walt's brother Roy was not around to constantly remind Walt about that, we may never of had any of the parks.
I'd suggest listening to Connecting with Walt. They do an excellent job of describing not just the creative innovations developed by Disney, but also the business planning that had to be performed by both brothers to become successful after many failures.
Also, just take a look at the attendance numbers of the parks. Epcot will most likely be in last place this time next year.