Fast & Furious Supercharged has soft opened.
One I saw said the queue is better than the ride.See any reviews yet? Only one I saw so far was basically “better than I was expecting but still not great”
One I saw said the queue is better than the ride.
I’m all for a good queue but it shouldn’t be better than the attraction.Hmm, with this and Jimmy Fallon that seems to be a bit of a trend
Saw another quick twitter review. All screens with little thrill. Queue has live actors like Fallon.I’m all for a good queue but it shouldn’t be better than the attraction.
From Bioreconstruct:Saw another quick twitter review. All screens with little thrill. Queue has live actors like Fallon.
One I saw said the queue is better than the ride.
Hmm, with this and Jimmy Fallon that seems to be a bit of a trend
Mickeys and Rat are mixes of screens and physical sets.Same was said about Kong (though I don't agree with that). Not sure what Universal is thinking with screen ride after screen ride. We find it gets so old there after two days of it. I hope Disney doesn't fall too much into this trap. (FOP is really a screen ride - if a bit unique - seems like Millenium Falcon will be a screen ride too...need to see how much Mickey's Runaway Train and Ratatouille and GotG ends up being screens. Screens have their place, but it's easy to get to too much. (Uni is already there IMO.)
One thing I think is odd is that people seem to be surprised it's a clone of the one is California. What else would it be? (And honestly I wouldn't expect any different from Disney if they did something like this. HUGE cost savings to only design something once and build it twice.)
I hope Disney doesn't overdo it! I have to say, I think the Na'vi River Journey uses a perfect amount of screen simulations blended amongst actual 3d items.Same was said about Kong (though I don't agree with that). Not sure what Universal is thinking with screen ride after screen ride. We find it gets so old there after two days of it. I hope Disney doesn't fall too much into this trap. (FOP is really a screen ride - if a bit unique - seems like Millenium Falcon will be a screen ride too...need to see how much Mickey's Runaway Train and Ratatouille and GotG ends up being screens. Screens have their place, but it's easy to get to too much. (Uni is already there IMO.)
One thing I think is odd is that people seem to be surprised it's a clone of the one is California. What else would it be? (And honestly I wouldn't expect any different from Disney if they did something like this. HUGE cost savings to only design something once and build it twice.)
Same was said about Kong (though I don't agree with that). Not sure what Universal is thinking with screen ride after screen ride. We find it gets so old there after two days of it. I hope Disney doesn't fall too much into this trap. (FOP is really a screen ride - if a bit unique - seems like Millenium Falcon will be a screen ride too...need to see how much Mickey's Runaway Train and Ratatouille and GotG ends up being screens. Screens have their place, but it's easy to get to too much. (Uni is already there IMO.)
Mickeys and Rat are mixes of screens and physical sets.
You could think of NRJ as a screen ride too.
I hope Disney doesn't overdo it! I have to say, I think the Na'vi River Journey uses a perfect amount of screen simulations blended amongst actual 3d items.
Yep lots of homages to past attractions in the queue from what I saw.If anyone is curious Tim Tracker rode F&F today and said it was a fun ride but nothing mind blowing. He loved the queue and said there's tons of hidden Easter eggs in the queue. He also said Kong is better.
Don’t forget the battle attraction. That will use screens too but also a lot of physical sets and AAs.