Well, first don't attack Leah, she is just doing her job. If you want to attack someone, take on me, as I wrote the blog post.
I will tell you I debated quite a lot about the blog post. I have seen quite a lot of recent anti-SeaWorld posts (on other sites). In the end, I thought DISsers might be interested to see what is happening behind the scenes. If you look at any of my other posts, you'll see I typically post about all sorts of legal issues that impact the Disney, Universal and SeaWorld theme parks. Some people have even, on occasion, said they find it interesting.
Now, I will admit, I have not been to SeaWorld nor do I have a strong desire to go to SeaWorld anytime soon. I don't believe I'm anti-SeaWorld, I just prefer to spend my Orlando vacation time doing something else and, if I want to see large marine mammals, I prefer to see them in their natural environment.
Now, if you want to talk about bias, I will admit I am no OSHA fan. Frankly, I tended to agree with SeaWorld that OSHA's subpoenas were very oddly timed. It is just that it is very difficult to get a judge to quash an administrative subpoena.
Given that this post is, so far, the only one I have seen which actually tries to explain SeaWorld's perspective on the OSHA's subpoenas, perhaps you could explain to me what exactly I said that would "discourage people from visiting Seaworld" or "paint[ed] Seaworld in a negative light."