gppnj
<a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis-sponsor/" targ
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 918
Hi. Please forgive me if this is a long post, but I'm looking for advice, and I want to give as much information about my personal situation as possible so you can give me the best information. I've already learned so much just from read all the other posts.
I will be buying into DVC in the next two months. However, I'm still not sure about the amount of points I should get. I am unlike the typical DVC member in that I am a single adult, and I do not have any family. I like to go on vacation. Although I have gone on vacation alone a few times, I generally go with a friend (but not the same friend every time).
I think the reason many people buy into DVC is so that they can affordably get larger accommodations that can hold their whole big family. Since that doesn't apply to me, why am I planning to buy into DVC? Two reasons:
1. I see it as a hedge against inflation. If I figured out the cost for me to stay one week at SSR in 2005 and compared it to one week at a non-DVC Disney resort in 2005, my guess is it's a better deal to stay at a non-DVC Disney resort. However, as the years roll on, my feeling is that that reverses. I see that way the rates at non-DVC Disney hotels have risen. In 2015, I'm pretty sure that it will be a much better deal to stay at a DVC resort with points purchased in 2005 than it is to stay at a non-DVC Disney resort at 2015 rates. (If anyone disagrees with this, please let me know. Maybe I'm looking at things the wrong way.) The more years pass, the more this trend is amplified.
2. The other reason DVC appeals to me is that it will essentially allow me to prepay for my vacations - and more so in my case than for most other people. When someone is traveling with their family, they've naturally got to cover all the costs of their trip themselves. By contrast, when I travel with a friend, we have to pay for our own airfare, but we split the cost of hotel accommodations. Therefore, when I stay at a DVC resort with a friend, I will have the friend reimburse me for his or she share of the room. I'm not looking to make a profit off of my friend, but I'm not under any obligation to cover my friends' expenses whenever we go away (I'm not independently wealthy), so I see nothing wrong with having them pay me a fair amount that's about half of what we would have spent on a hotel othewise. (I'll have to figure out exactly how I determine how much to charge.) I can use the money I get from my friend to cover other expenses such as park tickets and meals, which therefore essentially gives me a prepaid vacation (not just prepaid accommodations).
So now I'm back to my original issue: How many points should I get? In my case, I don't foresee ever renting a two-bedroom unit. A studio would be perfectly fine for me except that unfortunately the information I have says that studios have one bed rather than two. As a result, I'd say I'd be using studios when I'm traveling with a friend I don't mind sharing a bed with and getting a one-bedroom unit when I don't want to share a bed. (It's really a shame that studios don't have two beds.)
Although I love Walt Disney World, most of the time, I don't want to spend more than one week there in any particular year. From that standpoint, it would seem like the basic 150 points would be plenty for me. However, I never intend for my one week at WDW to be my only vacation in a given year. I like to visit various other places as well. That raises the question of whether I should buy more than 150 DVC points so that I can use my other points for my trips to other places. This is the essence of my confusion.
I'm hearing varying things on this board about the wisdom of using DVC points for things other than staying at DVC resorts. I know that with a given number of points, I'll never be able to stay as many nights somewhere else as I would at a DVC resort, and I don't have a problem with that. The real issue goes back to the matter of inflation. If, for example, I use 160 DVC points to trade for a week at a condo in Hawaii, will I save money versus just paying for that condo out of pocket? More importantly, if ten years from now I use 160 DVC points purchased in 2005 to trade for a week at a condo in Hawaii, will I save money versus just paying for that condo out of pocket? If I can still use my DVC points that I'll buy this year as a hedge against inflation, I suppose then it's worth it for me to buy enough DVC points to cover both my trips to WDW and my trips elsewhere. However, if using the points elsewhere is just a bad idea all around, I'm probably better off just getting enough to cover my WDW trips.
I would greatly appreciate any thoughts you have on this. (And thank you for reading this.)
I will be buying into DVC in the next two months. However, I'm still not sure about the amount of points I should get. I am unlike the typical DVC member in that I am a single adult, and I do not have any family. I like to go on vacation. Although I have gone on vacation alone a few times, I generally go with a friend (but not the same friend every time).
I think the reason many people buy into DVC is so that they can affordably get larger accommodations that can hold their whole big family. Since that doesn't apply to me, why am I planning to buy into DVC? Two reasons:
1. I see it as a hedge against inflation. If I figured out the cost for me to stay one week at SSR in 2005 and compared it to one week at a non-DVC Disney resort in 2005, my guess is it's a better deal to stay at a non-DVC Disney resort. However, as the years roll on, my feeling is that that reverses. I see that way the rates at non-DVC Disney hotels have risen. In 2015, I'm pretty sure that it will be a much better deal to stay at a DVC resort with points purchased in 2005 than it is to stay at a non-DVC Disney resort at 2015 rates. (If anyone disagrees with this, please let me know. Maybe I'm looking at things the wrong way.) The more years pass, the more this trend is amplified.
2. The other reason DVC appeals to me is that it will essentially allow me to prepay for my vacations - and more so in my case than for most other people. When someone is traveling with their family, they've naturally got to cover all the costs of their trip themselves. By contrast, when I travel with a friend, we have to pay for our own airfare, but we split the cost of hotel accommodations. Therefore, when I stay at a DVC resort with a friend, I will have the friend reimburse me for his or she share of the room. I'm not looking to make a profit off of my friend, but I'm not under any obligation to cover my friends' expenses whenever we go away (I'm not independently wealthy), so I see nothing wrong with having them pay me a fair amount that's about half of what we would have spent on a hotel othewise. (I'll have to figure out exactly how I determine how much to charge.) I can use the money I get from my friend to cover other expenses such as park tickets and meals, which therefore essentially gives me a prepaid vacation (not just prepaid accommodations).
So now I'm back to my original issue: How many points should I get? In my case, I don't foresee ever renting a two-bedroom unit. A studio would be perfectly fine for me except that unfortunately the information I have says that studios have one bed rather than two. As a result, I'd say I'd be using studios when I'm traveling with a friend I don't mind sharing a bed with and getting a one-bedroom unit when I don't want to share a bed. (It's really a shame that studios don't have two beds.)
Although I love Walt Disney World, most of the time, I don't want to spend more than one week there in any particular year. From that standpoint, it would seem like the basic 150 points would be plenty for me. However, I never intend for my one week at WDW to be my only vacation in a given year. I like to visit various other places as well. That raises the question of whether I should buy more than 150 DVC points so that I can use my other points for my trips to other places. This is the essence of my confusion.
I'm hearing varying things on this board about the wisdom of using DVC points for things other than staying at DVC resorts. I know that with a given number of points, I'll never be able to stay as many nights somewhere else as I would at a DVC resort, and I don't have a problem with that. The real issue goes back to the matter of inflation. If, for example, I use 160 DVC points to trade for a week at a condo in Hawaii, will I save money versus just paying for that condo out of pocket? More importantly, if ten years from now I use 160 DVC points purchased in 2005 to trade for a week at a condo in Hawaii, will I save money versus just paying for that condo out of pocket? If I can still use my DVC points that I'll buy this year as a hedge against inflation, I suppose then it's worth it for me to buy enough DVC points to cover both my trips to WDW and my trips elsewhere. However, if using the points elsewhere is just a bad idea all around, I'm probably better off just getting enough to cover my WDW trips.
I would greatly appreciate any thoughts you have on this. (And thank you for reading this.)