disneygpa
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2018
- Messages
- 797
But that assumes your HRmax is correct. Did you use 220-age? Because that's a faulty calculation with a huge standard deviation. It's an average, but the deviation from the average is so large it renders the calculation useless for most people. You are stating your HRmax is 168. Have you never seen a HR value higher than that ever?
I did use the 220 - age to arrive at the 168. I see your point. I routinely have a HR higher than 168 so that can't be my max. Looking at recent runs, I've had values as high as 193. That was only once and it was just a peak. However, I have seen values in the mid and upper 180's running up hills. I guess I need to do a maxHR test and see what my max actually is.
HRR = HRmax - HRrest
Assuming a 185 HRmax and HRrest of 51 my HRR = 134
My exercise HR @ 70% should be around 145. That sound about right?
This mornings run was 147 avg. I'm thinking that is probably about right. It was a very comfortable pace.
@DopeyBadger Just curious if you can see the HR data on my Strava?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Next topic:
Tuesday morning run! What a great morning for a run! A little chill to the morning, upper 30's and not a cloud in the sky! Moon was bright and might have been able to run without my headlamp if I wasn't so paranoid about tripping over things in the sidewalks.
fitbit stats
Total time 47:09
Total distance 4.03 miles
mile 1- 11:28
mile 2- 11:36
mile 3- 11:45
mile 4- 11:58
avg pace 11:42
avg HR 147
Something interesting to note on HR. While trying to run a slower pace I see bigger spikes in HR. When I've kept my paces faster, I usually get up to 165 or so and it hovers between 160 and 170. Today, the rate varied between 125 and 173 this seems to correlate to elevation gain or loss and pace. Makes sense I suspect, but I found it interesting.