Disney Doll
DIS Security Matron
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2000
- Messages
- 28,883
Quite frankly, if the same thing happened to my child, I would be following ducklite's advice to the letter. You say that I would not be selling anything to you if I sat in your office waiting for a meeting to occur. My response...wanna bet?declansdad said:I don't think that I am overgeneralizing. The US is the most litigous country in the world and on a number of different boards there is always someone who suggests a lawsuit. I didn't say people in the US are terrible people just that there is a tendency to use lawyers and the courts system to solve problems.
I did encourage the op to press charges against the girls who attacked her daughter. IMO that sends a stronger message than sueing the school/school district. As parents I feel we need to work with our schools instead of blaming them for everything that is wrong.
I'm glad you tried to work out a solution to your situation. The reason that I stated that it seemed confrontational is because the way in which you suggested things happen. For example, tell them that there would be a meeting tomorrow and demand certain people be there. If they are not, sit and wait until they arrive and not take no for an answer. It may be an old sales technique but you would not be selling anything to me using that technique.
Your lawsuit and others may not be asking for a financial settlement but there is still a cost involved. That is money that would need to be diverted in order to pay the costs of the lawyers and other peole involved. I don't have any first hand knowledge of your schools but in Canada every dollar than can be spent in the schools needs to be be spent there.
To those of you who disagree with me, I am not saying that you should never use the legal system, just that it doesn't always need to be the first resort. In ducklite's case, obviously it wasn't.
Guess what...the school failed this child. They failed her big time. And they failed the other children too, by not impressing upon them what is and is not acceptable behavior. And guess what else...the school knows it. And if they didn't know it, they would very shortly, because I would be following ducklite's advice and I would be hiring an attorney.
As far as the cost...well, if the school had done it's job in the first place and properly protected the children that are in it's care, then there would be no "cost", now would there?
So who is really responsible for the added "cost"? Not the victim, who finally snaps and does what they have to do to get some restitution. The school is responsible for the added "cost" because they didn't do what they know they should have been doing all along.
I agree that as much money as possible should be given to education, but not at the cost of my child's health or safety, when the situaiton could have and should have been prevented in the first place. Schools know their job and their responsibility.