It's so misguided to think you are helping these people live their entire lives on welfare. Now young women no longer need a husband or father for their children since they have the government, and everyone knows that the #! factor in determining who lives in poverty is a single mother household. You've taken away the families and churches who used to help people in need and replaced them with public assistance. You've taken away the self-esteem and pride that comes from working a job and providing for your family.
This is just a giant mess of assumption and confusion.
As btw, your original post referencing the Constitution said that it guarantees the pursuit of happiness. You then said you just meant to type the Declaration of Independence. However, that guarantees no one anything, it's a declaration, a statement. The Constitution guarantees.
Anyhoo.... when did women "need" husbands or fathers that have now apparently been replaced by the government? This suggests that women need men to work and make money.
The last sentence though, says that benefits "take[n] away the self-esteem and pride that comes from working a job and providing for your family." So... which is it? Should women have the self esteem and pride that comes from providing for their families, presumably from a job, or should they not, and get money from men?
I have no idea what you mean by the #1 factor in determining who lives in poverty is a single mother household, but pretty much any way you read it, no.
First, are you talking about the U.S. alone? Because there are a lot of poor people in the world and many of them live in areas with unstable social structure, food availbility, etc.
If you are talking about the U.S., there are a ton of factors that correlate to poverty - though you don't specify for whom, and you additionaly phrased it as if you're talking about causation, further complicating it.
However, correlation - single parent households are more likely to be in poverty, yes. Single households headed by women are more likely than those headed by men, yes. However, people with very little education are hugely likely to live in poverty. People born into poverty, hugely likely to live in poverty. People who are black or latino, younger, etc., etc., etc.
And, abutting all of this is the underlying false assumption that people receiving assistance are all unemployed (not true), living the high life (I'm not even), and doing this purposefully. As noted by someone above, many members of the military receive food stamps - as do airline pilots, other skilled workers and tons and tons of unskilled workers.
Of those women who head single-parent households? More than half of them are employed, and only a quarter of them receive cash welfare benefits.