AliceIn
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2012
- Messages
- 2,184
I foresee this being a problem. Too few and many will just do what they want wherever. We already see people smoking all over the park.
Maybe a ban on bringing cigarettes into parks?
I foresee this being a problem. Too few and many will just do what they want wherever. We already see people smoking all over the park.
So far the research I'm finding is focused on workplace and college campus issues. The research I've read, in this short amount of time, for the most part shows that outright smoking bans are more effective in reducing overall tobacco consumption than designated smoking areas are. Simply put, if you provide designated areas, people will smoke more than if there is an overall ban. All of the research I've seen so far is only taking about individual attitudes and consumption; none of the research I've seen so far focuses on the social dynamics we are discussing in this thread.
If I read it right they put a smoking area outside the parks. I would be ok with putting smoking outside the parks and keep inside the parks smoke free. It wouldn't be the most ideal as there would still be clean up and some exposure still (I would just prefer no smoking at all personally). At least then, while it is an inconvenience to go outside the park to smoke, we wouldn't have issues with those smoking in areas they weren't supposed to. Though as others have said enforcement of no smoking inside the parks would really need to be enforced. It also would lessen the number of times I'm right by someone (who I can't avoid) who just smoked.Because it is abused. Just returned from a trip and seen several people smoking outside of the designated smoking areas. I'm all for a designated smoking area outside the park; maybe a smoking room where the smoke is contained inside.
My husband currently works (until August thank goodness it's not longer) on a power plant in Maryland. He's not a contruction engineer (he's a mechanical engineer responsible for parts needed to build the power plant) so he's not on the actual site much.My workplace is a large campus. We went completely tobacco free a few years ago. If you want to smoke, you must get in your car and leave the property entirely. Nobody quit their jobs over it. Everybody I knew who smokes adjusted to not smoking during the day. In my opinion, smoking at theme parks and other public places is a public health issue, and bans there should be a a requirement. Perhaps Disney could build enclosed smoking areas near the parking lots, and then ban tobacco from entering the park, period.
Good grief. At least one in every thread...Now that the smoking issued has been covered, Disney really should do something about the cancer causing sun rays that are so ever-present in the parks!
And, the smoking areas can be avoided if so desired which is also doing something.
Bottom line is that some people smoke, some people don't and both are being addressed by Disney. Smokers should adhere to the policies and only smoke in the designated areas (and shame on those who do not) and nonsmokers should avoid the designated areas if they do not wish to be exposed to smoking. As for banning smoking in the parks all together, it is biased to suggest that as a solution if you are a nonsmoker (which I am by the way) and Disney is trying to address all of their guests.
Good grief. At least one in every thread...
Let me guess: you're equally worried about gators and mosquitos? Or feeding gators and feeding ducks?![]()
Ridiculous. Put me in a plexiglass box if you have to, but come on!
What tan dinabout the drinkers at Magic Kingdom? They have a right to drink, but they can't access alcohol until dinner time and only if they get a coveted reservation to BOG. No one cares about the drinkers and their right to their vices.
Perhaps, but if you have a drink next to me you will not destroy my liver as well as yours.
It was the continuation of a point being made on this thread that people needed to be allowed to smoke. I don't, however, see that courtesy provided to other vices.
I agree with you though, because I am extremely sensitive to smoking.
That looked like the smoking areas at the Hartsfield Atlanta airport. I would walk by and was astonished to see people with their children in there. It was disgusting. I was so glad the removed those glass rooms.
I'm a e-cig smoker, so I will put it out there first.
Smoking isn't illegal. There is a huge push to make smokers pariahs. It is now a social no-no, but smoking isn't illegal.
I've always followed the smoking rules at Disney, and get annoyed when people don't. I get very grumpy if I don't have a cigarette for a certain amount of time, and my family is happy to see me go and happier when I get back. I don't mind walking to an off the beaten path smoking area to have my cigarette. I didn't like several of the smoking areas so I didn't use them, for example, the castle walkway. I would love to be away from walk ways, and from other guests.
I'm not saying every smoker is a respectful smoker, nor is every guest a respectful guest.
One observation I would like to pass on from my experience in the smoking area, a nice portion of the guests using the smoking area appear to be international guests. I base this off the languages spoken, and the English spoken to me with authentic accents. Attitudes tword smoking vary from culture to culture. Perhaps the amicable solution would be is smoking areas that are more isolated.
First, regarding treating smokers like lepers...yes, smoking is increasingly seen as a socially unacceptable choice, and that's a GOOD thing! Smoking and the harm it causes to smokers and others via second hand smoke are a public health crisis. Second, no smokers do not have 'rights.' You do not have a 'right' to be allowed to smoke on private property (unless it's your own) and 'smoker' is not a protected class of people. The harder it is to smoke in public (because there are fewer places people are allowed to smoke) the less smokers will smoke, the less second hand smoke we are all exposed to, and hopefully fewer people take it up as a habit.
And honestly demanding or expecting a place to smoke in front of your kids and other people's kids is just selfish and gross. Wake up and stop letting these powerful tobacco companies steal years of your life from you and fleece your pocketbook while you contribute to poisoning the rest of us.
First, regarding treating smokers like lepers...yes, smoking is increasingly seen as a socially unacceptable choice, and that's a GOOD thing! Smoking and the harm it causes to smokers and others via second hand smoke are a public health crisis. Second, no smokers do not have 'rights.' You do not have a 'right' to be allowed to smoke on private property (unless it's your own) and 'smoker' is not a protected class of people. The harder it is to smoke in public (because there are fewer places people are allowed to smoke) the less smokers will smoke, the less second hand smoke we are all exposed to, and hopefully fewer people take it up as a habit.
And honestly demanding or expecting a place to smoke in front of your kids and other people's kids is just selfish and gross. Wake up and stop letting these powerful tobacco companies steal years of your life from you and fleece your pocketbook while you contribute to poisoning the rest of us.